These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29302784)

  • 1. Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Schaefgen B; Heil J; Barr RG; Radicke M; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Hennigs A; von Au A; Spratte J; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 29302784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First proof-of-concept evaluation of the FUSION-X-US-II prototype for the performance of automated breast ultrasound in healthy volunteers.
    Schaefgen B; Juskic M; Hertel M; Barr RG; Radicke M; Stieber A; Hennigs A; Riedel F; Sohn C; Heil J; Golatta M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):559-566. PubMed ID: 33970324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the FUSION-X-US-II prototype to combine automated breast ultrasound and tomosynthesis.
    Schäfgen B; Juskic M; Radicke M; Hertel M; Barr R; Pfob A; Togawa R; Nees J; von Au A; Fastner S; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Riedel F; Hennigs A; Sohn C; Heil J; Golatta M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3712-3720. PubMed ID: 33313983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial clinical results with a fusion prototype for mammography and three-dimensional ultrasound with a standard mammography system and a standard ultrasound probe.
    Emons J; Wunderle M; Hartmann A; Radicke M; Rauh C; Uder M; Gass P; Fasching PA; Langemann H; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Jud SM
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 29498297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS).
    Wojcinski S; Gyapong S; Farrokh A; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 13():36. PubMed ID: 24219312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
    Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
    Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
    Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
    Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner.
    Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.
    Thibault F; Dromain C; Breucq C; Balleyguier CS; Malhaire C; Steyaert L; Tardivon A; Baldan E; Drevon H
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2441-9. PubMed ID: 23673573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
    Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.
    Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary Clinical Experience with a Combined Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
    Larson ED; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Goodsitt MM; Lashbrook C; Davis CE; Kripfgans OD; Carson PL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 44(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 29311005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.