BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1080 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29303467)

  • 21. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.
    Phillips FM; Lee JY; Geisler FH; Cappuccino A; Chaput CD; DeVine JG; Reah C; Gilder KM; Howell KM; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E907-18. PubMed ID: 23591659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparable long-term outcomes in patients undergoing total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and noninstrumented fusion.
    Hirvonen T; Hämäläinen M; Konsti J; Antinheimo J; Numminen J; Siironen J; Koski-Palkén A; Niemelä M
    Spine J; 2023 Dec; 23(12):1817-1829. PubMed ID: 37660896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Zigler JE; Jackson R; Nunley PD; Bae HW; Kim KD; Ohnmeiss DD
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():10. PubMed ID: 27162712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis R; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim K; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum R; Stokes J
    Int J Spine Surg; 2014; 8():. PubMed ID: 25694918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
    Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Different Hybrid Techniques for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease-Analysis of Prospectively Collected Clinical, Radiologic, and Psychological Parameters.
    Brotzki C; Petridis AK; Steiger HJ; Bostelmann T; Bostelmann R
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():e112-e120. PubMed ID: 32371075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single-Level Cervical Disc Replacement Using a PEEK-on-Ceramic Implant: Results of a Multicenter FDA IDE Trial With 24-Month Follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Coric D; Nunley PD; Sasso RC; Musacchio M; Bae HW; Peloza JH; Ohnmeiss DD
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):633-644. PubMed ID: 34281951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical fusion for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical fusion surgery: Review of treatment in 41 patients.
    Lee SB; Cho KS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 162():59-66. PubMed ID: 28938108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and Radiologic Features of 3 Reconstructive Procedures for the Surgical Management of Patients with Bilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease at a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years: A Comparative Study.
    Wang KF; Duan S; Zhu ZQ; Liu HY; Liu CJ; Xu S
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e70-e76. PubMed ID: 29408574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Phillips FM; Geisler FH; Gilder KM; Reah C; Howell KM; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):674-83. PubMed ID: 25955086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.
    Phillips FM; Coric D; Sasso R; Lanman T; Lavelle W; Blumenthal S; Lauryssen C; Guyer R; Albert T; Zigler J; Cammisa F; Milam RA
    Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):239-252. PubMed ID: 33096243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; McConnell JR; Hodges SD; Schranck FW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jun; 31(4):508-518. PubMed ID: 31226684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zou S; Gao J; Xu B; Lu X; Han Y; Meng H
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 27314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register.
    MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Löfgren H; Michaëlsson K; Olerud C
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):159-167. PubMed ID: 30485205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?
    Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):577-585. PubMed ID: 28291414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of 1- and 2-Level Total Disc Replacement: Four-Year Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter IDE Clinical Trial.
    Bae HW; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Jackson RJ; Hisey MS; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Peterson DL; Stokes JM; Araghi A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):759-66. PubMed ID: 25785955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.