195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29304105)
1. Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer.
Wang H; Du K; Qu J; Chandarana H; Das IJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190883. PubMed ID: 29304105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.
Wang H; Chandarana H; Block KT; Vahle T; Fenchel M; Das IJ
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jun; 12(1):108. PubMed ID: 28651599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT relative to bulk density assignment-based magnetic resonance-only approaches for prostate radiotherapy.
Kim J; Garbarino K; Schultz L; Levin K; Movsas B; Siddiqui MS; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst C
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():239. PubMed ID: 26597251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a novel algorithm for generating synthetic CT images from magnetic resonance imaging data sets for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Kim J; Glide-Hurst C; Doemer A; Wen N; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25442341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Dosimetric Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance-Generated Synthetic CT Images for Focal Brain VMAT Radiation Therapy.
Paradis E; Cao Y; Lawrence TS; Tsien C; Feng M; Vineberg K; Balter JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Dec; 93(5):1154-61. PubMed ID: 26581151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of peripheral NSCLC SBRT using Acuros XB and AAA calculation algorithms.
Ong CCH; Ang KW; Soh RCX; Tin KM; Yap JHH; Lee JCL; Bragg CM
Med Dosim; 2017 Autumn; 42(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 28711478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of deep learning synthetic CTs for MR-only brain radiation therapy.
Liu X; Emami H; Nejad-Davarani SP; Morris E; Schultz L; Dong M; K Glide-Hurst C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 22(1):308-317. PubMed ID: 33410568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric impact of different CT datasets for stereotactic treatment planning using 3D conformal radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Oechsner M; Odersky L; Berndt J; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ; Duma MN
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():249. PubMed ID: 26626865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer.
Price RG; Kim JP; Zheng W; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Jul; 95(4):1281-9. PubMed ID: 27209500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).
Tajaldeen A; Ramachandran P; Alghamdi S; Geso M
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2019; 24(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 31333334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT.
Kim KH; Chung JB; Suh TS; Kang SW; Kang SH; Eom KY; Song C; Kim IA; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207232. PubMed ID: 30419058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for single-fraction thoracic vertebral metastases stereotactic body radiosurgery.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; McClinton C; Shen X; Badkul R; Jiang H; Mallory M; Mitchell M; Wang F; Lominska C
Med Dosim; 2017 Spring; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 28129972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer.
Guo H; Wang J; Xia X; Zhong Y; Peng J; Zhang Z; Hu W
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 34162410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of region extraction and assigned mass-density values on the accuracy of dose calculation with magnetic resonance-based volumetric arc therapy planning.
Usui K; Sasai K; Ogawa K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 29542016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of computed tomography contrast agent on radiotherapy dose calculation for pancreatic carcinoma: A dosimetric study based on tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques.
Zhu F; Wu W; Zhu F; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xia T
Med Dosim; 2017 Winter; 42(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 28818321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT.
Chen L; Price RA; Wang L; Li J; Qin L; McNeeley S; Ma CM; Freedman GM; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):636-47. PubMed ID: 15380601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment plans using averaged computed tomography and end-exhalation computed tomography images: Evaluation of the effect of different dose-calculation algorithms and prescription methods.
Mitsuyoshi T; Nakamura M; Matsuo Y; Ueki N; Nakamura A; Iizuka Y; Mampuya WA; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):305-309. PubMed ID: 27623737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ART for head and neck patients: On the difference between VMAT and IMPT.
Góra J; Kuess P; Stock M; Andrzejewski P; Knäusl B; Paskeviciute B; Altorjai G; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1166-74. PubMed ID: 25850583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]