438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29304138)
1. The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
Thakur SS; Li H; Chan AMY; Tudor R; Bigras G; Morris D; Enwere EK; Yang H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188983. PubMed ID: 29304138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Oncotype DX and TAILORx risk categories using histopathological and immunohistochemical markers by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
Ingoldsby H; Webber M; Wall D; Scarrott C; Newell J; Callagy G
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):879-86. PubMed ID: 23643806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship of Oncotype Dx score with tumor grade, size, nodal status, proliferative marker Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index in early breast cancer tumors in Saudi Population.
Durrani S; Al-Mushawa F; Heena H; Wani T; Al-Qahtani A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Apr; 51():151674. PubMed ID: 33360027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlating Ki67 and other prognostic markers with Oncotype DX recurrence score in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Tan AC; Li BT; Nahar K; Danieletto S; Fong ES; Currer T; Parasyn A; Middleton P; Wong H; Smart D; Rutovitz JJ; McCloud P; Hughes TM; Marx GM
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):e161-e166. PubMed ID: 28960862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the Ki67 Working Group prognostic risk categories with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in early breast cancer.
Patel R; Hovstadius M; Kier MW; Moshier EL; Zimmerman BS; Cascetta K; Jaffer S; Sparano JA; Tiersten A
Cancer; 2022 Oct; 128(20):3602-3609. PubMed ID: 35947048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing Oncotype DX use in the management of early breast cancer: a single centre experience.
Zhu X; Dent S; Paquet L; Zhang T; Graham N; Song X
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Oct; 50(15):2544-9. PubMed ID: 25129366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Prognostic Significance of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in T
Wang M; Wu K; Zhang P; Zhang M; Ding A; Chen H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 30456680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Progesterone receptor expression in proliferating cancer cells of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.
Ueno T; Saji S; Chiba T; Kamma H; Isaka H; Itoh H; Imi K; Miyamoto K; Tada M; Sasano H; Toi M; Imoto S
Tumour Biol; 2018 Nov; 40(10):1010428318811025. PubMed ID: 30841783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing?
Allison KH; Kandalaft PL; Sitlani CM; Dintzis SM; Gown AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(2):413-24. PubMed ID: 21369717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intratumor Heterogeneity Affects Gene Expression Profile Test Prognostic Risk Stratification in Early Breast Cancer.
Gyanchandani R; Lin Y; Lin HM; Cooper K; Normolle DP; Brufsky A; Fastuca M; Crosson W; Oesterreich S; Davidson NE; Bhargava R; Dabbs DJ; Lee AV
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Nov; 22(21):5362-5369. PubMed ID: 27185370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can features evaluated in the routine pathologic assessment of lymph node-negative estrogen receptor-positive stage I or II invasive breast cancer be used to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score?
Auerbach J; Kim M; Fineberg S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 134(11):1697-701. PubMed ID: 21043825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nottingham-defined mitotic score: comparison with visual and image cytometric phosphohistone H3 labeling indices and correlation with Oncotype DX recurrence score.
Zbytek B; Cohen C; Wang J; Page A; Williams DJ; Adams AL
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2013 Jan; 21(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22495373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of the Ki67 scoring categories in breast cancer subgroups.
Niikura N; Masuda S; Kumaki N; Xiaoyan T; Terada M; Terao M; Iwamoto T; Oshitanai R; Morioka T; Tuda B; Okamura T; Saito Y; Suzuki Y; Tokuda Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Oct; 14(5):323-329.e3. PubMed ID: 24492237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer.
Lee SB; Kim J; Sohn G; Kim J; Chung IY; Kim HJ; Ko BS; Son BH; Ahn SH; Lee JW; Jung KH
Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 30384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression in HR-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Tan QX; Qin QH; Yang WP; Mo QG; Wei CY
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):6862-70. PubMed ID: 25400769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
