These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29304734)

  • 1. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.
    Koitsalu M; Eklund M; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H; Brandberg Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 29304734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
    Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Cole SR; Smith A; Wilson C; Turnbull D; Esterman A; Young GP
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):73-5. PubMed ID: 17626705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theory-based modifications of an advanced notification letter improves screening for bowel cancer in men: A randomised controlled trial.
    Zajac IT; Duncan AC; Flight I; Wittert GA; Cole SR; Young GP; Wilson CJ; Turnbull DA
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 165():1-9. PubMed ID: 27485727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kilsdonk E; van Dulmen-den Broeder E; van der Pal HJ; Hollema N; Kremer LC; van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM; van Leeuwen FE; Jaspers MW; van den Berg MH
    JMIR Cancer; 2015 Nov; 1(2):e11. PubMed ID: 28410161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing behavioral interventions to optimize participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain.
    Stoffel S; Benito L; Milà N; Travier N; Binefa G; Vidal C; Espinosa J; Moreno V; Garcia M
    Prev Med; 2019 Feb; 119():58-62. PubMed ID: 30594532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
    Dokkum NF; Koekenbier RH; van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Op de Coul EL
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Mar; 12():176. PubMed ID: 22404911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-notification and reminder SMS text messages with behaviourally informed invitation letters to improve uptake of NHS Health Checks: a factorial randomised controlled trial.
    Sallis A; Sherlock J; Bonus A; Saei A; Gold N; Vlaev I; Chadborn T
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Aug; 19(1):1162. PubMed ID: 31438908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomised controlled trial.
    Sahlqvist S; Song Y; Bull F; Adams E; Preston J; Ogilvie D;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():62. PubMed ID: 21548947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost-effective approach to increasing participation in patient-reported outcomes research in cancer: A randomized trial of video invitations.
    Signorelli C; Wakefield CE; McLoone JK; Mateos MK; Aaronson NK; Lavoipierre A; Cohn RJ;
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Feb; 148(4):971-980. PubMed ID: 32748404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.
    Glidewell L; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Bonetti D; Johnston M; Eccles MP; Edlin R; Pitts NB; Clarkson J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():250. PubMed ID: 22891875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.
    Cook DA; Wittich CM; Daniels WL; West CP; Harris AM; Beebe TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e244. PubMed ID: 27637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of pre-notifications and reminders on participation in colorectal cancer screening - A randomised controlled trial.
    Larsen MB; Hedelund M; Flander L; Andersen B
    Prev Med; 2022 Nov; 164():107229. PubMed ID: 36057390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey.
    Roberts H; Pearson JC; Dengler R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Aug; 47(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 8228774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collection of vaccination data in the German National Cohort : Findings of a feasibility study in three study centers.
    Schultze A; Akmatov MK; Castell S; Karch A; Ahrens W; Günther K; Schlenz H; Flesch-Janys D; Obi N; Pessler F; Krause G
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Nov; 57(11):1292-9. PubMed ID: 25293888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE).
    Pisera M; Kaminski MF; Kraszewska E; Rupinski M; Regula J
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 28(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26967693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.
    Harrison S; Henderson J; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 30894130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised trial of prostate cancer screening in The Netherlands: assessment of acceptance and motives for attendance.
    Nijs HG; Tordoir DM; Schuurman JH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9275269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.