189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29305446)
1. The risk of cardiac failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
Sabah SA; Moon JC; Jenkins-Jones S; Morgan CL; Currie CJ; Wilkinson JM; Porter M; Captur G; Henckel J; Chaturvedi N; Kay P; Skinner JA; Hart AJ; Manisty C
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29305446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty is not associated with cardiac disease.
Goodnough LH; Bala A; Huddleston J; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Amanatullah DF
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29305447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.
Matharu GS; Nandra RS; Berryman F; Judge A; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 28455467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heart failure after conventional metal-on-metal hip replacements.
Gillam MH; Pratt NL; Inacio MC; Roughead EE; Shakib S; Nicholls SJ; Graves SE
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 27759468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There a Cardiotoxicity Associated With Metallic Head Hip Prostheses? A Cohort Study in the French National Health Insurance Databases.
Lassalle M; Colas S; Rudnichi A; Zureik M; Dray-Spira R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1441-1451. PubMed ID: 29698302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of revised metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a Dutch arthroplasty register study.
Jelsma J; van Kuijk SMJ; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Grimm B; Heyligers IC; Schotanus MGM
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec; 142(12):4025-4032. PubMed ID: 34846589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midterm risk of cancer with metal-on-metal hip replacements not increased in a Finnish population.
Ekman E; Laaksonen I; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Pukkala E; Mäkelä K
Acta Orthop; 2018 Oct; 89(5):575-579. PubMed ID: 29912603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term changes in blood metal ion levels after Articular Surface Replacement arthroplasty of the hip.
Galea VP; Laaksonen I; Matuszak SJ; Connelly JW; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):33-40. PubMed ID: 28363892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Diagnosis of Infection in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.
Grammatopoulos G; Munemoto M; Inagaki Y; Tanaka Y; Athanasou NA
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2569-2573. PubMed ID: 27235328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.
Lainiala OS; Reito AP; Nieminen JJ; Eskelinen AP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2058-2064.e1. PubMed ID: 31174908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Postoperative Complications Following Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With Other Hip Bearings in Medicare Population.
Kleeman LT; Bala A; Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1826-1832. PubMed ID: 29510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 28768778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications of Introducing New Technology: Comparative Survivorship Modeling of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements and Contemporary Alternatives in the National Joint Registry.
Hunt LP; Whitehouse MR; Beswick A; Porter ML; Howard P; Blom AW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 29406339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
