115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29306369)
1. Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Hayre C; Bungay H; Jeffery C; Cobb C; Atutornu J
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29306369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How effective are lead-rubber aprons in protecting radiosensitive organs from secondary ionizing radiation?
Hayre CM; Bungay H; Jeffery C
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e264-e269. PubMed ID: 32303421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RE: Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Flintham K; Field L; Harris MA; Kan A; Snaith B
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):90-91. PubMed ID: 29306383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to letter: Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Hayre CM; Bungay H; Jeffery C; Cobb C; Atutornu J
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):184. PubMed ID: 29605117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
Welborn D; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performances of a protector against scattered radiation during intraoperative use of a C-arm fluoroscope.
Sung KH; Jung YJ; Kwon SS; Lee GW; Youb Chung C; Lee KM; Cha H; Park MS; Lee K
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):629-640. PubMed ID: 27517131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into the effect of protective devices on the dose to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Clarke P
Br J Radiol; 1992 Sep; 65(777):799-802. PubMed ID: 1393418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT--shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments.
Hopper KD; King SH; Lobell ME; TenHave TR; Weaver JS
Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):853-8. PubMed ID: 9393547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of patient dose reduction by bismuth shielding in CT using measurements, GEANT4 and MCNPX simulations.
Mendes M; Costa F; Figueira C; Madeira P; Teles P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):175-81. PubMed ID: 25813483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.
Lee SY; Min E; Bae J; Chung CY; Lee KM; Kwon SS; Park MS; Lee K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2108-12. PubMed ID: 23963017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of a Commercial Lead Apron on Patient Skin Dose Delivered During Oral and Maxillofacial Examinations under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Schulze RKW; Sazgar M; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
Health Phys; 2017 Aug; 113(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28658058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of bismuth shield for protection of superficial radiosensitive organs in patients undergoing computed tomography: a literature review and meta-analysis.
Mehnati P; Malekzadeh R; Sooteh MY
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Mar; 12(1):6-25. PubMed ID: 30790174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study.
Elshami W; Abuzaid MM; Tekin HO
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():697-704. PubMed ID: 32636688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phantom study of a self-shielded X-ray bone age assessment instrument against scattered radiation in children.
Wang X; Xu M; Zhu H; Ma L; Chen C; Jiang Q; Wu W; Hu D; Zhou W; Chen R; Gao L; Yu X; Wang L; Cai X; Liu H; Xia L
Pediatr Radiol; 2024 Apr; 54(4):646-652. PubMed ID: 38472490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield.
Price R; Halson P; Sampson M
Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):489-94. PubMed ID: 10505015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Protection of eye lens in computed tomography--dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations].
Keil B; Wulff J; Schmitt R; Auvanis D; Danova D; Heverhagen JT; Fiebich M; Madsack B; Leppek R; Klose KJ; Zink K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1047-53. PubMed ID: 19235699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
