113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29306383)
1. RE: Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Flintham K; Field L; Harris MA; Kan A; Snaith B
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):90-91. PubMed ID: 29306383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to letter: Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Hayre CM; Bungay H; Jeffery C; Cobb C; Atutornu J
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):184. PubMed ID: 29605117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs?
Hayre C; Bungay H; Jeffery C; Cobb C; Atutornu J
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29306369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How effective are lead-rubber aprons in protecting radiosensitive organs from secondary ionizing radiation?
Hayre CM; Bungay H; Jeffery C
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e264-e269. PubMed ID: 32303421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Repair of defects of the diaphragm with rubber sponge].
BASS MM
Eksp Khirurgiia; 1959; 4():47. PubMed ID: 13797401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What is a low dose? Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Reply to the Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' Reply to "Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' ".
Smith GM
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):93-101; author reply 99-101. PubMed ID: 20234069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection against ionizing radiation from external sources used in medicine. A report of Committee 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP; 1982; 9(1):1-69. PubMed ID: 7137729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using patient shielding - What is the risk?
Hiles P
Br J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 94(1126):20210701. PubMed ID: 34347543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of ionising radiations in medicine. A new era?
Bourguignon MH
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 44(4):299-300. PubMed ID: 11302256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. For discussion: obtaining consent for ionising radiation: has the time come?
Mendelson RM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Oct; 54(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 20958946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate.
Wakeford R; Tawn EJ
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifty years of individual monitoring of ionising radiation in Switzerland: history, trends and perspectives.
Moser M; Elmiger R; Frei D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):76-9. PubMed ID: 21123239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RBE and wR values of sparsely ionising radiations.
Chadwwick KH; leenhouts HP
J Radiol Prot; 2007 Dec; 27(4):503-4. PubMed ID: 18273998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation protection and safety in medical use of ionising radiation in Republic of Bulgaria--harmonization of the national legislation with Euratom directives.
Ingilizova K; Vassileva J; Rupova I; Pavlova A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):260-2. PubMed ID: 16461505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A new radiation protection device for cardiologists active in interventional radiology].
Utech A; Schulze R; Sievert H
Z Kardiol; 1994 May; 83(5):336-9. PubMed ID: 8053241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of various methods for designing the shielding from ionising radiation at PET-CTinstallations.
Antić V; Stanković K; Vujisić M; Osmokrović P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 22899217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonstochastic effects of ionizing radiation.
Ann ICRP; 1984; 14(3):1-33. PubMed ID: 6399822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulation of radiation protection of the patient: how and how much, the current Belgian situation.
Clarijs T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):54-6. PubMed ID: 21733857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EVOLUTION OF THE IEC AND EN STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL MONITORING OF IONISING RADIATION.
Voytchev M; Behrens R; Ambrosi P; Radev R; Chiaro P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):13-6. PubMed ID: 26443545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications for human and environmental health of low doses of ionising radiation.
Mothersill C; Seymour C
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():5-9. PubMed ID: 23664231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
