These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29306703)

  • 1. Trace organic contaminant rejection by aquaporin forward osmosis membrane: Transport mechanisms and membrane stability.
    Xie M; Luo W; Guo H; Nghiem LD; Tang CY; Gray SR
    Water Res; 2018 Apr; 132():90-98. PubMed ID: 29306703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relating rejection of trace organic contaminants to membrane properties in forward osmosis: measurements, modelling and implications.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():265-74. PubMed ID: 24345822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomimetic aquaporin membranes for osmotic membrane bioreactors: Membrane performance and contaminant removal.
    Luo W; Xie M; Song X; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhou JL; Nghiem LD
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Feb; 249():62-68. PubMed ID: 29040861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transport of trace organic compounds through novel forward osmosis membranes: Role of membrane properties and the draw solution.
    Sauchelli M; Pellegrino G; D'Haese A; Rodríguez-Roda I; Gernjak W
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 141():65-73. PubMed ID: 29778066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13486-93. PubMed ID: 24236858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the transport of neutral disinfection byproducts in forward osmosis: Roles of reverse salt flux.
    Xu J; Tran TN; Lin H; Dai N
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116255. PubMed ID: 32771562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of humic acid fouling on membrane performance and transport of pharmaceutically active compounds in forward osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4567-75. PubMed ID: 23764606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrostatic interaction governed solute transport in forward osmosis.
    Qiu G; Wong GKW; Ting YP
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 173():115590. PubMed ID: 32062225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the organic micropollutants transport mechanisms in the fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis process.
    Kim Y; Li S; Phuntsho S; Xie M; Shon HK; Ghaffour N
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 248():109240. PubMed ID: 31310933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory and pilot evaluation of aquaporin-based forward osmosis membranes for rejection of micropollutants.
    Li R; Braekevelt S; De Carfort JLN; Hussain S; Bollmann UE; Bester K
    Water Res; 2021 Apr; 194():116924. PubMed ID: 33618109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synthesis and Application of Organic Phosphonate Salts as Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Oil-Water Separation.
    Long Q; Shen L; Chen R; Huang J; Xiong S; Wang Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(21):12022-12029. PubMed ID: 27689510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward Solute Transport in Forward Osmosis Using a Freestanding Graphene Oxide Membrane.
    Liu S; Tong X; Chen Y; Crittenden J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(9):6290-6298. PubMed ID: 33861066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes.
    Ge Q; Fu F; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():230-8. PubMed ID: 24768702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding Rejection Mechanisms of Trace Organic Contaminants by Polyamide Membranes via Data-Knowledge Codriven Machine Learning.
    Wang H; Zeng J; Dai R; Wang Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Apr; 58(13):5878-5888. PubMed ID: 38498471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
    She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of Operating Conditions in a Pilot Scale Investigation of Hollow Fiber Forward Osmosis Membrane Modules.
    Sanahuja-Embuena V; Khensir G; Yusuf M; Andersen MF; Nguyen XT; Trzaskus K; Pinelo M; Helix-Nielsen C
    Membranes (Basel); 2019 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 31163624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the mechanisms of trace organic contaminant removal by high retention membrane bioreactors: a critical review.
    Asif MB; Ansari AJ; Chen SS; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Hai FI
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34085-34100. PubMed ID: 30259242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.