These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29306746)

  • 1. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Template selection and refinement considerations for modelling aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes.
    Urmi KF; Finch AM; Griffith R
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():488-503. PubMed ID: 28818718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
    Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GPCR Homology Model Generation for Lead Optimization.
    Tautermann CS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():115-131. PubMed ID: 29188560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
    Beuming T; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of template choice on homology model efficiency in virtual screening.
    Rataj K; Witek J; Mordalski S; Kosciolek T; Bojarski AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1661-8. PubMed ID: 24813470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?
    Mobarec JC; Sanchez R; Filizola M
    J Med Chem; 2009 Aug; 52(16):5207-16. PubMed ID: 19627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
    Yarnitzky T; Levit A; Niv MY
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using molecular dynamics for the refinement of atomistic models of GPCRs by homology modeling.
    Lupala CS; Rasaeifar B; Gomez-Gutierrez P; Perez JJ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Jul; 36(9):2436-2448. PubMed ID: 28728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Galaxy7TM: flexible GPCR-ligand docking by structure refinement.
    Lee GR; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W502-6. PubMed ID: 27131365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures.
    Yau MQ; Emtage AL; Chan NJY; Doughty SW; Loo JSE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 May; 33(5):487-496. PubMed ID: 30989574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
    Sato M; Hirokawa T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ligand-optimized homology models of D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors: application for virtual screening.
    Kołaczkowski M; Bucki A; Feder M; Pawłowski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 23398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?
    Kapla J; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Ballante F; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e1008936. PubMed ID: 33983933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.