389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29307685)
1. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel KN; Salunke A; Bakshi G; Jayaprakash D; Pandya SJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e11-112.e22. PubMed ID: 34895995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.
Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J
BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy vs Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma Penis: Expanding Role and Comparison of Outcomes.
Yadav SS; Tomar V; Bhattar R; Jha AK; Priyadarshi S
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():79-84. PubMed ID: 29155185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
Patel AS; Isharwal S
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Coblentz TR; Theodorescu D
J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1386-9. PubMed ID: 12352399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic and robotic video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy by the lateral approach.
Jindal T; Meena M
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):464-469. PubMed ID: 33200462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Carcinoma Penis.
Rawal SK; Singh A; Khanna A
J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(S2):S12-S17. PubMed ID: 36154450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis.
Thyavihally YB; Dev P; Waigankar SS; Pednekar A; Kulkarni B; Sharma A; Maheshwari S; Roy D; Agarwal V; Khandekar AA; Badlani ND; Asari AN; Sanwalka N
J Robot Surg; 2021 Dec; 15(6):905-914. PubMed ID: 33484414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Carcinoma Vulva: Our Experiences and Intermediate Results.
Jain V; Sekhon R; Giri S; Hassan N; Batra K; Shah SH; Rawal S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jan; 27(1):159-165. PubMed ID: 27870714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Parra RO
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 8558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.
Yuan P; Zhao C; Liu Z; Ou Z; He W; Cai Y; Wang Y; Zu X; Qi L; Wang L
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 29256632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.
Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using Near-infrared Fluorescence in Vulvar Cancer.
Mohammad A; Hunter MI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):968-972. PubMed ID: 30959199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
