These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29307902)

  • 41. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients.
    Donaldson W; Abraham A; Deighan M; Michalek P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Jun; 155(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21804625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study.
    Kini G; Devanna GM; Mukkapati KR; Chaudhuri S; Thomas D
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 24803754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of performance of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway™, Laryngeal Mask Airway-ProSeal and endotracheal tube in prone position: A prospective, randomised study.
    Hegde HV; Bandi J; Mudakanagoudar MS; Honnannavar KA
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 62(3):173-181. PubMed ID: 29643550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway improves oxygenation when used as a conduit prior to laryngoscope guided intubation in bariatric patients.
    Sinha A; Jayaraman L; Punhani D; Panigrahi B
    Indian J Anaesth; 2013 Jan; 57(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23716762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.
    Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD
    Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal.
    Chauhan G; Nayar P; Seth A; Gupta K; Panwar M; Agrawal N
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23493414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians.
    Perilli V; Aceto P; Sacco T; Martella N; Cazzato MT; Sollazzi L
    Indian J Anaesth; 2014 Jan; 58(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 24700895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N
    Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z
    Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices.
    Thee C; Serocki G; Doerges V; Ilies C; Wallenius K; Bein B; Steinfath M; Cavus E
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 May; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 20216069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of actual and ideal body weight for selection of appropriate size of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in overweight and obese patients: A prospective, randomised study.
    Solanki SL; Doctor JR; Shekhawat KK; Myatra SN; Joshi M; Divatia JV
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 May; 61(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 28584349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway.
    Dahaba AA; Prax N; Gaube W; Gries M; Rehak PH; Metzler H
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Apr; 61(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 16548950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size 2 and 2½ in anesthetized and paralyzed pediatric patients with same weight group: A prospective randomized clinical study.
    Mahajan R; Taxak S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2014; 8(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 25886330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia.
    Kannan S; Harsoor SS; Sowmiya L; Nethra SS; DevikaRani D; Sathesha M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 31(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 26702211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of videolaryngoscope-guided versus standard digital insertion techniques of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized study.
    Ozgul U; Erdil FA; Erdogan MA; Begec Z; Colak C; Yucel A; Durmus M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 31888511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
    Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Basic life support trained nurses ventilate more efficiently with laryngeal mask supreme than with facemask or laryngeal tube suction-disposable--a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Gruber E; Oberhammer R; Balkenhol K; Strapazzon G; Procter E; Brugger H; Falk M; Paal P
    Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 24440666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Oral gastric tube-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is an easy and noninvasive method for less experienced users.
    Nagata T; Kishi Y; Tanigami H; Hiuge Y; Sonoda S; Ohashi Y; Kagawa K; Ushioda A
    J Anesth; 2012 Aug; 26(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22407240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of supraglottic airway i-gel™ vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children.
    Lee JH; Cho HS; Shin WJ; Yang HS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 66(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 24624270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.