These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29308421)

  • 1. Are we missing the sitting? Agreement between accelerometer non-wear time validation methods used with older adults' data.
    Chudyk AM; McAllister MM; Cheung HK; McKay HA; Ashe MC
    Cogent Med; 2017; 4():1313505. PubMed ID: 29308421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.
    Vanhelst J; Vidal F; Drumez E; Béghin L; Baudelet JB; Coopman S; Gottrand F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 30940079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying ActiGraph non-wear time in pregnant women with overweight or obesity.
    Leonard KS; Pauley AM; Hohman EE; Guo P; Rivera DE; Savage JS; Buman MP; Symons Downs D
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1197-1201. PubMed ID: 32859522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying accelerometer nonwear and wear time in older adults.
    Hutto B; Howard VJ; Blair SN; Colabianchi N; Vena JE; Rhodes D; Hooker SP
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2013 Oct; 10():120. PubMed ID: 24156309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study.
    Keadle SK; Shiroma EJ; Freedson PS; Lee IM
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1210. PubMed ID: 25421941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of the GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adult sedentary time in free living.
    Pavey TG; Gomersall SR; Clark BK; Brown WJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2016 May; 19(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 25956687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of objective methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: a systematic review.
    Heesch KC; Hill RL; Aguilar-Farias N; van Uffelen JGZ; Pavey T
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Nov; 15(1):119. PubMed ID: 30477509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying sedentary time using automated estimates of accelerometer wear time.
    Winkler EA; Gardiner PA; Clark BK; Matthews CE; Owen N; Healy GN
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 May; 46(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 21504965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer.
    Choi L; Ward SC; Schnelle JF; Buchowski MS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Oct; 44(10):2009-16. PubMed ID: 22525772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.
    Zhou SM; Hill RA; Morgan K; Stratton G; Gravenor MB; Bijlsma G; Brophy S
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007447. PubMed ID: 25968000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of ActiGraph data processing techniques for measuring sedentary behavior in adults with COPD.
    Webster KE; Colabianchi N; Ploutz-Snyder R; Gothe N; Smith EL; Larson JL
    Physiol Meas; 2021 Aug; 42(8):. PubMed ID: 34325404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the Marshall Sitting Questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis.
    Sasaki JE; Motl RW; McAuley E
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Jun; 37(11):1250-1256. PubMed ID: 30543314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of allowable interruption period on estimates of accelerometer wear time and sedentary time in older adults.
    Mailey EL; Gothe NP; Wójcicki TR; Szabo AN; Olson EA; Mullen SP; Fanning JT; Motl RW; McAuley E
    J Aging Phys Act; 2014 Apr; 22(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 23752299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of an Algorithm for Measurement of Sedentary Behaviour in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
    Abdul Jabbar K; Sarvestan J; Zia Ur Rehman R; Lord S; Kerse N; Teh R; Del Din S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 37430519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and application of an automated algorithm to identify a window of consecutive days of accelerometer wear for large-scale studies.
    Rillamas-Sun E; Buchner DM; Di C; Evenson KR; LaCroix AZ
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():270. PubMed ID: 26113170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying adults' valid waking wear time by automated estimation in activPAL data collected with a 24 h wear protocol.
    Winkler EA; Bodicoat DH; Healy GN; Bakrania K; Yates T; Owen N; Dunstan DW; Edwardson CL
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Oct; 37(10):1653-1668. PubMed ID: 27652827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative Wear-time Estimation Methods Compared to Traditional Diary Logs for Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers in Pregnant Women.
    Ehrlich SF; Casteel AJ; Crouter SE; Hibbing PR; Hedderson MM; Brown SD; Galarce M; Coe DP; Bassett DR; Ferrara A
    J Meas Phys Behav; 2020 Jun; 3(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 33997656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the pain of activity log-books worth the gain in precision when distinguishing wear and non-wear time for tri-axial accelerometers?
    Peeters G; van Gellecum Y; Ryde G; Farías NA; Brown WJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Nov; 16(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 23294696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.