213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29309718)
1. A Modified Extensile Anterior Approach to the Acetabulum for Severe Acetabular Defects.
Moskal JT; Driesen R; Koc BB; Yerasimides J; Corten K
Orthopedics; 2018 Mar; 41(2):e194-e201. PubMed ID: 29309718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up.
Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jun; 88(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 16757760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.
Berend ME; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Cates H; Faris P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):50-54. PubMed ID: 29292340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery.
Carroll FA; Hoad-Reddick DA; Kerry RM; Stockley I
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 May; 90(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 18450621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-mobility bearings for patients with abductor-trochanteric complex insufficiency.
Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun R
Hip Int; 2018 Sep; 28(5):491-497. PubMed ID: 29781290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extensile Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip for Severe Acetabular Defects.
Moskal JT; Manson TT; Corten K; Yerasimides YJS
Instr Course Lect; 2020; 69():15-24. PubMed ID: 32017715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.
Fink B; Schlumberger M; Oremek D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 28353049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
Liu W; Yang J; Pei F; Shen B; Zhou Z; Kang P
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Rahman WA; Amenábar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect.
Kim KC; Ha YC; Kang BJ; Lee YK; Ji HM; Koo KH
J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22094605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
