These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29310599)
21. Understanding how midwives employed by the National Health Service facilitate women's alternative birthing choices: Findings from a feminist pragmatist study. Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242508. PubMed ID: 33216777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Hadjigeorgiou E; Kouta C; Papastavrou E; Papadopoulos I; Mårtensson LB Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 21683487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Barriers to women's access to alongside midwifery units in England. Rayment J; Rance S; McCourt C; Sandall Cbe Rm J Midwifery; 2019 Oct; 77():78-85. PubMed ID: 31271963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How women with high risk pregnancies use lay information when considering place of birth: A qualitative study. Lee S; Holden D; Ayers S Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 26282618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The kaleidoscopic midwife: A conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers' perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. A grounded theory study. Borrelli SE; Spiby H; Walsh D Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():103-11. PubMed ID: 27321727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage? Overgaard C; Fenger-Grøn M; Sandall J BMC Public Health; 2012 Jun; 12():478. PubMed ID: 22726575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: a qualitative research study. Walsh D; Spiby H; McCourt C; Grigg C; Coleby D; Bishop S; Scanlon M; Culley L; Wilkinson J; Pacanowski L; Thornton J BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e033895. PubMed ID: 32071182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deciding on home or hospital birth: results of the Ontario Choice of Birthplace Survey. Murray-Davis B; McDonald H; Rietsma A; Coubrough M; Hutton E Midwifery; 2014 Jul; 30(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 24613009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care. Macfarlane AJ; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Turner LR Midwifery; 2014 Sep; 30(9):1009-20. PubMed ID: 24929271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. First-time mothers' expectations of the unknown territory of childbirth: Uncertainties, coping strategies and 'going with the flow'. Borrelli SE; Walsh D; Spiby H Midwifery; 2018 Aug; 63():39-45. PubMed ID: 29778717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. Schroeder E; Petrou S; Patel N; Hollowell J; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Brocklehurst P; BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2292. PubMed ID: 22517916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study. Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Monk A; Tracy MB BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():339. PubMed ID: 26679339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. Li Y; Townend J; Rowe R; Brocklehurst P; Knight M; Linsell L; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Newburn M; Marlow N; Pasupathy D; Redshaw M; Sandall J; Silverton L; Hollowell J BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 25603762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Jackson M; Dahlen H; Schmied V Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):561-7. PubMed ID: 22300611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Organising safe and sustainable care in alongside midwifery units: Findings from an organisational ethnographic study. McCourt C; Rance S; Rayment J; Sandall J Midwifery; 2018 Oct; 65():26-34. PubMed ID: 30032066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study. Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mode of birth and medical interventions among women at low risk of complications: A cross-national comparison of birth settings in England and the Netherlands. de Jonge A; Peters L; Geerts CC; van Roosmalen JJM; Twisk JWR; Brocklehurst P; Hollowell J PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180846. PubMed ID: 28749944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]