These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29311428)

  • 1. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials.
    Kanat-Ertürk B; Saridağ S; Köseler E; Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D; Avcu E; Yildiran-Avcu Y
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 29311428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
    Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of restorative material selection and cementation procedures on the durability of endocrowns in the anterior teeth: an in-vitro study.
    Samra N; Madina MM; El-Negoly SAE; Dawood L
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):670. PubMed ID: 38851731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD CAM Endocrowns made of feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate: A two-year mixed cohort study.
    Jalali S; Asgari N; Pirooz P; Younespour S; Atri F
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105019. PubMed ID: 38670333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of feldspathic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM endocrowns for maxillary premolars.
    Saglam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31929199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review.
    AlHelal AA
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of endocrowns after thermomechanical aging.
    Dikici B; Can E; Türkeş Başaran E; Barut G; Dönmez N
    Odontology; 2024 Jul; 112(3):884-894. PubMed ID: 38289451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials.
    Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of material thickness on fractural strength of CAD/CAM fabricated ceramic crowns.
    Zimmermann M; Egli G; Zaruba M; Mehl A
    Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 28835598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
    Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs.
    Alghazzawi TF; Lemons J; Liu PR; Essig ME; Janowski GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 23217471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness.
    Taha D; Spintzyk S; Schille C; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):293-297. PubMed ID: 29241944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.
    Tsitrou EA; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19683378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns.
    Rocca GT; Daher R; Saratti CM; Sedlacek R; Suchy T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():41-50. PubMed ID: 29107134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.