These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29311563)

  • 21. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography.
    Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking via Deep Learning.
    Dot G; Schouman T; Chang S; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L
    J Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 101(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 35982646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.
    Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D facial landmark detection under large yaw and expression variations.
    Perakis P; Passalis G; Theoharis T; Kakadiaris IA
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2013 Jul; 35(7):1552-64. PubMed ID: 23681986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Serafin M; Baldini B; Cabitza F; Carrafiello G; Baselli G; Del Fabbro M; Sforza C; Caprioglio A; Tartaglia GM
    Radiol Med; 2023 May; 128(5):544-555. PubMed ID: 37093337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accurate registration of cone-beam computed tomography scans to 3-dimensional facial photographs.
    Nahm KY; Kim Y; Choi YS; Lee J; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 24485741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Effect of Landmark Variability on Automated PAP Mask Sizing.
    Johnston B; Chazal P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4129-4132. PubMed ID: 31946779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Mar; 42(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 20947062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated landmarking and labeling of fully and partially scanned spinal columns in CT images.
    Major D; Hladůvka J; Schulze F; Bühler K
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1151-63. PubMed ID: 23978670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
    Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
    Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Virtual facial reconstruction based on accurate registration and fusion of 3D facial and MSCT scans.
    Zhou Z; Li P; Ren J; Guo J; Huang Y; Tian W; Tang W
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Mar; 77(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 26914453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison Study of Extraction Accuracy of 3D Facial Anatomical Landmarks Based on Non-Rigid Registration of Face Template.
    Wen A; Zhu Y; Xiao N; Gao Z; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang S; Zhao Y
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated landmarking for palatal shape analysis using geometric deep learning.
    Croquet B; Matthews H; Mertens J; Fan Y; Nauwelaers N; Mahdi S; Hoskens H; El Sergani A; Xu T; Vandermeulen D; Bronstein M; Marazita M; Weinberg S; Claes P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):144-152. PubMed ID: 34169645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cascaded Collaborative Regression for Robust Facial Landmark Detection Trained Using a Mixture of Synthetic and Real Images With Dynamic Weighting.
    Feng ZH; Hu G; Kittler J; Christmas W; Wu XJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):3425-40. PubMed ID: 26087493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.