These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29312030)

  • 1. Positive Arousal Increases Individuals' Preferences for Risk.
    Galentino A; Bonini N; Savadori L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2142. PubMed ID: 29312030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threat affects risk preferences in movement decision making.
    O'Brien MK; Ahmed AA
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():150. PubMed ID: 26106311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.
    FeldmanHall O; Glimcher P; Baker AL; Phelps EA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27690508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making: arousal increases when experience and additional cues conflict.
    Glöckner A; Hochman G
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 20705548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple timescales of temporal context in risky choice: Behavioral identification and relationships to physiological arousal.
    Brooks HR; Sokol-Hessner P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0296681. PubMed ID: 38241251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hypoxia and risk preferences: Mild hypoxia impacts choices for low-probability high-payoff bets.
    Pighin S; Bonini N; Hadjichristidis C; Schena F; Modena R; Savadori L
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():960773. PubMed ID: 36105278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social Comparisons are Associated with Poorer and Riskier Financial Decision Making, no Matter whether Encounters are Sporadic or Repeated.
    Barrós-Loscertales A; Espín AM; Perales JC
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Sep; 19():E57. PubMed ID: 27647543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social interaction effects: The impact of distributional preferences on risky choices.
    Gantner A; Kerschbamer R
    J Risk Uncertain; 2018; 56(2):141-164. PubMed ID: 29937628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dissolution of temporal distance increases risk-taking: experimental evidence.
    Muda R; Niszczota P; Augustynowicz P; Markiewicz Ł
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16565. PubMed ID: 30409999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain correlates of risky decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Sartori G; Rumiati R; Vidotto G; Daum I
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1886-94. PubMed ID: 19761850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental patterns of change in the influence of safe and risky peer choices on risky decision-making.
    Braams BR; Davidow JY; Somerville LH
    Dev Sci; 2019 Jan; 22(1):e12717. PubMed ID: 30105854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neither Threat of Shock nor Acute Psychosocial Stress Affects Ambiguity Attitudes.
    Sambrano DC; Lormestoire A; Raio C; Glimcher P; Phelps EA
    Affect Sci; 2022; 3(2):425-437. PubMed ID: 35791419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tune yourself in: Valence and arousal preferences in music-listening choices from adolescence to old age.
    Cohrdes C; Wrzus C; Frisch S; Riediger M
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Sep; 53(9):1777-1794. PubMed ID: 28581313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. So, It's Pricier Than Before, but Why? Price Increase Justifications Influence Risky Decision Making and Emotional Response.
    Salcedo JC; Jiménez-Leal W
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1883. PubMed ID: 31551845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of Internet gaming disorder.
    Ko CH; Wang PW; Liu TL; Chen CS; Yen CF; Yen JY
    Eur Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 44():189-197. PubMed ID: 28646731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.
    Dickhaut J; McCabe K; Nagode JC; Rustichini A; Smith K; Pardo JV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3536-41. PubMed ID: 12626760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual picture processing interferes with decision-making under ambiguity.
    Laier C; Pawlikowski M; Brand M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Apr; 43(3):473-82. PubMed ID: 23733155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making.
    Best R; Freund AM
    Gerontology; 2018; 64(5):475-484. PubMed ID: 29621760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulating the contribution of approach-avoidance to the perturbation of economic choice by valence.
    Wright ND; Morris LS; Guitart-Masip M; Dolan RJ
    Front Neurosci; 2013; 7():228. PubMed ID: 24363641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Positive and Negative Feedback on Risk-Taking across Different Contexts.
    Losecaat Vermeer AB; Sanfey AG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139010. PubMed ID: 26407298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.