These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29312053)

  • 1. KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.
    Garrido MV; Prada M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2181. PubMed ID: 29312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
    Garrido MV; Lopes D; Prada M; Rodrigues D; Jerónimo R; Mourão RP
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 27573005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective ratings and emotional recognition of children's facial expressions from the CAFE set.
    Prada M; Garrido MV; Camilo C; Rodrigues DL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209644. PubMed ID: 30589868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Observers and Automated Assessment of Dynamic Emotional Facial Expressions: KDEF-dyn Database Validation.
    Calvo MG; Fernández-Martín A; Recio G; Lundqvist D
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2052. PubMed ID: 30416473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You look pretty happy: Attractiveness moderates emotion perception.
    Lindeberg S; Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2019 Sep; 19(6):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 30234330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived emotion genuineness: normative ratings for popular facial expression stimuli and the development of perceived-as-genuine and perceived-as-fake sets.
    Dawel A; Wright L; Irons J; Dumbleton R; Palermo R; O'Kearney R; McKone E
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1539-1562. PubMed ID: 27928745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
    Aguado L; Martínez-García N; Solís-Olce A; Dieguez-Risco T; Hinojosa JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():66-76. PubMed ID: 29751931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prototypicality and intensity of emotional faces using an anchor-point method.
    Sánchez A; Vázquez C
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E7. PubMed ID: 23866254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.
    Hagemann J; Straube T; Schulz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():136-49. PubMed ID: 26878979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of facial sex cues on emotional expression categorization is not fixed.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 27379894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional expressions of old faces are perceived as more positive and less negative than young faces in young adults.
    Hass NC; Schneider EJ; Lim SL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1276. PubMed ID: 26379599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial expression at retrieval affects recognition of facial identity.
    Chen W; Liu CH; Li H; Tong K; Ren N; Fu X
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():780. PubMed ID: 26106355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition.
    Nomi JS; Rhodes MG; Cleary AM
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 22712473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empathy, emotional contagion, and rapid facial reactions to angry and happy facial expressions.
    Dimberg U; Thunberg M
    Psych J; 2012 Dec; 1(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 26272762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.
    Liao HI; Shimojo S; Yeh SL
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 23356560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model Gender Interacts With Expressed Emotion to Enhance Startle: Angry Male and Happy Female Faces Produce the Greatest Potentiation.
    Åsli O; Øvervoll M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():576544. PubMed ID: 33240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adult age-differences in subjective impression of emotional faces are reflected in emotion-related attention and memory tasks.
    Svärd J; Fischer H; Lundqvist D
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():423. PubMed ID: 24860535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-cultural emotion recognition and evaluation of Radboud faces database with an Indian sample.
    Mishra MV; Ray SB; Srinivasan N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203959. PubMed ID: 30273355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual effects of surprised expressions on the encoding and recognition of emotional target faces: An event-related potential (ERP) study.
    Lin H; Schulz C; Straube T
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():273-281. PubMed ID: 28939385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of emotional empathy to approachability judgments assigned to emotional faces is context specific.
    Willis ML; Lawson DL; Ridley NJ; Koval P; Rendell PG
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1209. PubMed ID: 26347680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.