These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29313291)

  • 1. Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading.
    Snell J; Bertrand D; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 29313291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias.
    Snell J; Grainger J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 29858975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parafoveal pre-processing in children reading English: The importance of external letters.
    Milledge SV; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 32918232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements?
    Marcet A; Perea M; Baciero A; Gomez P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 29969979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading.
    Snell J; Meade G; Meeter M; Holcomb P; Grainger J
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():276-283. PubMed ID: 31002854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is zjudge a better prime for JUDGE than zudge is?: A new evaluation of current orthographic coding models.
    Lupker SJ; Spinelli G; Davis CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1252-1266. PubMed ID: 32757591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
    Kennedy A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1032-46. PubMed ID: 23106372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.
    Boudelaa S; Norris D; Mahfoudhi A; Kinoshita S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):729-757. PubMed ID: 31120301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter encoding in visual word identification: more evidence for a word-integration explanation for parafoveal preview effects in reading.
    Kwantes PJ; Mewhort DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.
    Grainger J; Granier JP; Farioli F; Van Assche E; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):865-84. PubMed ID: 16846285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming.
    Peressotti F; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):691-706. PubMed ID: 10370337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A crowdful of letters: disentangling the role of similarity, eccentricity and spatial frequencies in letter crowding.
    Zahabi S; Arguin M
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():45-51. PubMed ID: 24561213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.