These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29313292)

  • 41. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning.
    Vandierendonck A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1995 Dec; 2(4):442-59. PubMed ID: 24203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.
    Medin DL; Altom MW; Murphy TD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):333-52. PubMed ID: 6235306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning.
    Ashby FG; Maddox WT; Bohil CJ
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):666-77. PubMed ID: 12219884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predicting transfer performance: a comparison of competing function learning models.
    McDaniel MA; Dimperio E; Griego JA; Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):173-95. PubMed ID: 19210089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories.
    Kurtz KJ; Boukrina O; Gentner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1303-10. PubMed ID: 23421515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation-Based Category Learning.
    Chin-Parker S; Cantelon J
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Aug; 41(6):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 27564059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Blocking as a friend of induction in verbal category learning.
    Sorensen LJ; Woltz DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1000-13. PubMed ID: 27115608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The development of categorization: effects of classification and inference training on category representation.
    Deng WS; Sloutsky VM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Mar; 51(3):392-405. PubMed ID: 25602938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Visual category learning: Navigating the intersection of rules and similarity.
    Hughes GI; Thomas AK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):711-731. PubMed ID: 33464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do Americans Have a Preference for Rule-Based Classification?
    Murphy GL; Bosch DA; Kim S
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2026-2052. PubMed ID: 28000954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The evaluative role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex in rule-based category learning.
    Paniukov D; Davis T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():19-31. PubMed ID: 29107769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The contrast diversity effect: Increasing the diversity of contrast examples increases generalization from a single item.
    Kalkstein DA; Bosch DA; Kleiman T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):296-315. PubMed ID: 31081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Jan; 13(1):87-108. PubMed ID: 2949055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.
    Bowman CR; Zeithamova D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1442-1464. PubMed ID: 32105147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of set size on identity and oddity abstract-concept learning in rats.
    Lazarowski L; Goodman A; Galizio M; Bruce K
    Anim Cogn; 2019 Sep; 22(5):733-742. PubMed ID: 31147849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Two tests of instance-based and abstract rule-based accounts of invariant learning.
    Ward G; Churchill EF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Sep; 99(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 9771162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.
    Flannagan MJ; Fried LS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 2939181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.