These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29313917)
1. At its best, peer review is wonderful to behold. Samimi M; Anstey A Br J Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 177(6):1466-1467. PubMed ID: 29313917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes". Siedlecki SL Nurs Manage; 2016 Jul; 47(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 27351121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Point/Counterpoint. Peer reviews of medical physics practices often yield little information because the AAPM has not been proactive in developing appropriate peer-review guidelines. Gossman M; Halvorsen P; Orton CG Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3701-4. PubMed ID: 17985614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. Stossel TP N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 2019 Reviewers of the Year: improving the quality of the journal and the field. Malone RE Tob Control; 2020 Jan; 29(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 31852829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school. Algase DL Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review in medical journals. Morgan P Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6521):646. PubMed ID: 3081207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance]. Kudaiberdieva G Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The art of peer review. Oumeish OY Skinmed; 2008; 7(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18174795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The process of a peer-reviewed journal. Pearson GS Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer review process in health journals. Vettore MV Cad Saude Publica; 2009 Nov; 25(11):2306-7. PubMed ID: 19936469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process. de Hon F; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists. Gelenberg AJ J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]