138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29314781)
1. Characterizing the fluid dynamics of the inverted frustoconical shaking bioreactor.
Zhu L; Zhang X; Cheng K; Lv Z; Zhang L; Meng Q; Yuan S; Song B; Wang Z
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Mar; 34(2):478-485. PubMed ID: 29314781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Studies on fluid dynamics of the flow field and gas transfer in orbitally shaken tubes.
Zhu LK; Song BY; Wang ZL; Monteil DT; Shen X; Hacker DL; De Jesus M; Wurm FM
Biotechnol Prog; 2017 Jan; 33(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 27690196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time efficient way to calculate oxygen transfer areas and power input in cylindrical disposable shaken bioreactors.
Klöckner W; Lattermann C; Pursche F; Büchs J; Werner S; Eibl D
Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(6):1441-56. PubMed ID: 25138595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CFD of mixing of multi-phase flow in a bioreactor using population balance model.
Sarkar J; Shekhawat LK; Loomba V; Rathore AS
Biotechnol Prog; 2016 May; 32(3):613-28. PubMed ID: 26850863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) analysis of mixing and gas-liquid mass transfer in shake flasks.
Zhang H; Williams-Dalson W; Keshavarz-Moore E; Shamlou PA
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2005 Feb; 41(Pt 1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15310285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrodynamic performance of a single-use aerated stirred bioreactor in animal cell culture: applications of tomography, dynamic gas disengagement (DGD), and CFD.
Kazemzadeh A; Elias C; Tamer M; Ein-Mozaffari F
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2018 May; 41(5):679-695. PubMed ID: 29445862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishment of a CFD-based k
Wutz J; Steiner R; Assfalg K; Wucherpfennig T
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Sep; 34(5):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 30281943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving product quality and productivity of an antibody-based biotherapeutic using inverted frustoconical shaking bioreactors.
Wang X; Xu J; Guo Q; Li Z; Cao J; Fu R; Xu M; Zhao X; Wang F; Zhang X; Dong T; Li X; Qian W; Hou S; Ji L; Zhang D; Guo H
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1352098. PubMed ID: 38585708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large-scale culture of a megakaryocytic progenitor cell line with a single-use bioreactor system.
Nurhayati RW; Ojima Y; Dohda T; Kino-Oka M
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Mar; 34(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 29226613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oxygen transfer phenomena in 48-well microtiter plates: determination by optical monitoring of sulfite oxidation and verification by real-time measurement during microbial growth.
Kensy F; Zimmermann HF; Knabben I; Anderlei T; Trauthwein H; Dingerdissen U; Büchs J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):698-708. PubMed ID: 15696519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental and CFD-PBM Study of Oxygen Mass Transfer Coefficient in Different Impeller Configurations and Operational Conditions of a Two-Phase Partitioning Bioreactor.
Moradkhani H; Izadkhah MS; Anarjan N
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Feb; 181(2):710-724. PubMed ID: 27723011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of gas-liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates.
Hermann R; Lehmann M; Büchs J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Jan; 81(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 12451554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of computational fluid dynamics in tissue engineering.
Patrachari AR; Podichetty JT; Madihally SV
J Biosci Bioeng; 2012 Aug; 114(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22608554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a CFD model for cell culture bioreactors at large scale and its application in scale-up.
Xing Z; Duane G; O'Sullivan J; Chelius C; Smith L; Borys MC; Khetan A
J Biotechnol; 2024 May; 387():79-88. PubMed ID: 38582408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of orbitally-shaken and stirred-tank bioreactors: pH modulation and bioreactor type affect CHO cell growth and protein glycosylation.
Monteil DT; Juvet V; Paz J; Moniatte M; Baldi L; Hacker DL; Wurm FM
Biotechnol Prog; 2016 Sep; 32(5):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 27453130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of mass transfer behavior in a bioreactor for hairy root culture. I. Model development and experimental validation.
Liu R; Sun W; Liu CZ
Biotechnol Prog; 2011; 27(6):1661-71. PubMed ID: 22238770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between mass transfer coefficient kLa and relevant operating parameters in cylindrical disposable shaken bioreactors on a bench-to-pilot scale.
Klöckner W; Gacem R; Anderlei T; Raven N; Schillberg S; Lattermann C; Büchs J
J Biol Eng; 2013 Dec; 7(1):28. PubMed ID: 24289110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Isotope labeling to determine the dynamics of metabolic response in CHO cell perfusion bioreactors using MALDI-TOF-MS.
Karst DJ; Steinhoff RF; Kopp MRG; Soos M; Zenobi R; Morbidelli M
Biotechnol Prog; 2017 Nov; 33(6):1630-1639. PubMed ID: 28840654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerical simulation of scaling-up an inverted frusto-conical shaking bioreactor with low shear stress for mammalian cell suspension culture.
Ding N; Li C; Guo M; Mohsin A; Zhang S
Cytotechnology; 2019 Apr; 71(2):671-678. PubMed ID: 30848405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. k(L)a as a predictor for successful probe-independent mammalian cell bioprocesses in orbitally shaken bioreactors.
Tissot S; Michel PO; Hacker DL; Baldi L; De Jesus M; Wurm FM
N Biotechnol; 2012 Feb; 29(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 22142586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
