These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29315194)

  • 21. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Longitudinal Development of Executive Functioning and Spoken Language Skills in Preschool-Aged Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Kronenberger WG; Xu H; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1128-1147. PubMed ID: 32204645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Ren L; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Qin Y; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Wei C; Liu Y
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 34288631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
    Richter ME; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exceptional Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation: Lessons From Two Case Studies.
    Herbert CJ; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Nelson RF
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):552-566. PubMed ID: 35944073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Training of Speech Perception in Noise in Pre-Lingual Hearing Impaired Adults With Cochlear Implants Compared With Normal Hearing Adults.
    Bugannim Y; Roth DA; Zechoval D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e316-e325. PubMed ID: 30741913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids: Speech Perception, Language, and Executive Function Outcomes.
    Boerrigter MS; Vermeulen AM; Benard MR; van Dijk HJE; Marres HAM; Mylanus EAM; Langereis MC
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):411-422. PubMed ID: 36607737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: The Degradation of Phonemic Sensitivity.
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun; 37(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26967255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.