These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29315495)

  • 1. Extension of caution indices to mixed-format tests.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):363-386. PubMed ID: 29315495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymptotic Corrections of Standardized Extended Caution Indices.
    Sinharay S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):418-433. PubMed ID: 29882544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymptotically Correct Standardization of Person-Fit Statistics Beyond Dichotomous Items.
    Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):992-1013. PubMed ID: 25953476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
    Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
    Seol H
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23442324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-Order Probability Matching Priors for the Person Parameter in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Liu Y; Hannig J; Pal Majumder A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):701-718. PubMed ID: 31264028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality on Type I and Type II Error Rates using the Q-Index Item Fit Statistic for the Rasch Model.
    Estrada S
    J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(4):496-514. PubMed ID: 33989202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models.
    Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 12029178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the Bootstrap Method to Evaluate the Critical Range of Misfit for Polytomous Rasch Fit Statistics.
    Seol H
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Jun; 118(3):937-56. PubMed ID: 27207735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data.
    Smith AB; Rush R; Fallowfield LJ; Velikova G; Sharpe M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():33. PubMed ID: 18510722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.
    Karabatsos G
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 12029176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional pairwise person parameter estimates in Rasch models.
    Kreiner S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 23270977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
    Smith RM; Plackner C
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.