230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29316589)
1. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Sodhi N; Yao B; Newman JM; Jawad M; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Lamaj S; Beyer GA; Wilhelm AB; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Dec; 31():322-326. PubMed ID: 29316589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Sodhi N; Piuzzi NS; Khlopas A; Newman JM; Kryzak TJ; Stearns KL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):340-344. PubMed ID: 28993077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Peterson J; Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Sultan AA; Stearns KL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S39-S42. PubMed ID: 29276122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty.
Samuel LT; Grits D; Acuña AJ; Piuzzi NS; Higuera-Rueda CA; Kamath AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Feb; 102(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 31609889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units.
Sodhi N; Patel Y; Berger RJ; Newman JM; Anis HK; Ehiorobo JO; Khlopas A; Desai R; Hollern DA; Schwartz JM; Paulino CB; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():363-368. PubMed ID: 31373381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are Joint Surgeons Being Adequately Compensated for Single-Component versus Double-Component Revision TKA? An Analysis of Relative Value Units.
Malik AT; Scharschmidt TJ; Li M; Jain N; Khan SN
J Knee Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(6):593-596. PubMed ID: 30861538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barriers to Revision Total Hip Service Lines: A Surgeon's Perspective Through a Deterministic Financial Model.
Feng JE; Anoushiravani AA; Schoof LH; Gabor JA; Padilla J; Slover J; Schwarzkopf R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1657-1666. PubMed ID: 32574471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in reimbursement for primary and revision total elbow arthroplasty.
Sugarman BS; Belay ES; Saltzman EB; Richard MJ; Ruch DS; Anakwenze OA; Klifto CS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):146-150. PubMed ID: 32610075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments.
Orr RD; Sodhi N; Dalton SE; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Newman JM; Savage J; Mroz TE; Mont MA
Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1727-1732. PubMed ID: 29410308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost Analysis of Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Institutional Database Study.
Denyer S; Eikani C; Bujnowski D; Farooq H; Brown N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Mar; 105(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 36727914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?
Sodhi N; Dalton SE; Garbarino LJ; Gold PA; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Mont MA
Ann Transl Med; 2019 Feb; 7(4):74. PubMed ID: 30963069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Retrospective Review of Reimbursement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Disparity Between Case Complexity and RVU Compensation.
Patel A; Oladipo V; Kerzner B; McGlothlin JD; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S807-S813. PubMed ID: 35283235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative Value Units Underestimate Reimbursement for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Belay ES; Charalambous LT; Saltzman EB; Klifto CS; Anakwenze O
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 May; 30(9):416-420. PubMed ID: 35171845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Adequately Compensated by Work Relative Value Units.
Quan T; Best MJ; Gu A; Stake S; Golladay GJ; Thakkar SC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 May; 36(5):1496-1501. PubMed ID: 33349496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of Neurosurgical Work Relative Value Units with Objective Markers of Operative Complexity.
Chiu RG; Siddiqui N; Nunna RS; Patel S; Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Hobbs JG; Mehta AI
World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e194-e204. PubMed ID: 33091644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dedicated revision total knee service: a surgeon’s perspective.
Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Anoushiravani AA; Slover J; Schwarzkopf R
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6):675-681. PubMed ID: 31154839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between Relative Value Units and Operative Time for Flap-Based Reconstruction Procedures.
Dibbs RP; Skochdopole A; Reul RM; Beh HZ; Ferry AM; Conlon CJ; O'Neill R; Reece E; Winocour S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Feb; 151(2):299e-307e. PubMed ID: 36696331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Retrospective Review of Relative Value Units in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Dichotomy Between Surgical Complexity and Reimbursement.
Patel A; Oladipo VA; Kerzner B; McGlothlin JD; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S44-S49. PubMed ID: 35304033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Epidemiology and Trends of Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Revision Procedure in Korea between 2007 and 2017.
Kim SJ; Sung IH; Song SY; Jo YH
J Korean Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(22):e169. PubMed ID: 32508066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does complexity relate to compensation? A comparison of relative value units in initial versus recurrent inguinal hernia repair.
Doval AF; Nguyen-Lee JJ; Beal LL; Zheng F; Echo A
Hernia; 2020 Apr; 24(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 31401726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
