These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29316881)

  • 1. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.
    Munn Z; Stern C; Aromataris E; Lockwood C; Jordan Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29316881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR).
    Baxter S; Johnson M; Chambers D; Sutton A; Goyder E; Booth A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 30999848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apostolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Jun; 19(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 34061049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consideration of health inequalities in systematic reviews: a mapping review of guidance.
    Maden M
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):202. PubMed ID: 27894332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews.
    Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apóstolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2108-2118. PubMed ID: 32813460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
    Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shifting sands - from descriptions to solutions.
    Armstrong R; Pettman TL; Waters E
    Public Health; 2014 Jun; 128(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 24916424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2005; 3(6):1-33. PubMed ID: 27819973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practical overview of how to conduct a systematic review.
    Davis D
    Nurs Stand; 2016 Nov; 31(12):60-71. PubMed ID: 27897766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.