255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29317274)
1. Skin corrosion test: a comparison between reconstructed human epidermis and full thickness skin models.
Catarino CM; do Nascimento Pedrosa T; Pennacchi PC; de Assis SR; Gimenes F; Consolaro MEL; de Moraes Barros SB; Maria-Engler SS
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2018 Apr; 125():51-57. PubMed ID: 29317274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439.
Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Epidermal-skin-test 1,000 (EST-1,000)--a new reconstructed epidermis for in vitro skin corrosivity testing.
Hoffmann J; Heisler E; Karpinski S; Losse J; Thomas D; Siefken W; Ahr HJ; Vohr HW; Fuchs HW
Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Oct; 19(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 16061350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Tornier C; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1779-92. PubMed ID: 26187475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new reconstructed human epidermis for in vitro skin irritation testing.
Pedrosa TDN; Catarino CM; Pennacchi PC; Assis SR; Gimenes F; Consolaro MEL; Barros SBM; Maria-Engler SS
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Aug; 42():31-37. PubMed ID: 28344105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test.
Alépée N; Tornier C; Robert C; Amsellem C; Roux MH; Doucet O; Pachot J; Méloni M; de Brugerolle de Fraissinette A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):257-66. PubMed ID: 19733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of an in-house reconstructed human epidermis model as an alternative method in skin corrosion assessment.
Chacón M; Vázquez N; Persinal-Medina M; Alonso-Alonso S; Pevida M; Llames S; Baamonde B; Quiros L; Merayo-Lloves J; Meana Á
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104779. PubMed ID: 31962200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The usefulness of the validated SkinEthic™ RHE test method to identify skin corrosive UN GHS subcategories.
Alépée N; Robert C; Tornier C; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Jun; 28(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 24389111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro skin corrosion: Human skin model test - A validation study.
Deshmukh GR; Kumar KH; Reddy PV; Rao BS
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1072-4. PubMed ID: 22542585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Employment of cytology for in vitro skin irritation test using a reconstructed human epidermis model, Keraskin™.
Hwang JH; Jeong H; Hur S; Nam KT; Lim KM
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():104962. PubMed ID: 32781017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the optimized SkinEthic Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) 42 bis skin irritation protocol over 39 test substances.
Tornier C; Amsellem C; Fraissinette Ade B; Alépée N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):245-56. PubMed ID: 19733227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. KeraSkin-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests.
Jung KM; Lee SH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Heo Y; Park YH; Bae S; Lim KM; Seok SH
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 24625437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method based on an open source reconstructed epidermis (phase II).
Groeber F; Schober L; Schmid FF; Traube A; Kolbus-Hernandez S; Daton K; Hoffmann S; Petersohn D; Schäfer-Korting M; Walles H; Mewes KR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():254-261. PubMed ID: 27435616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SkinEthic™ RHE for in vitro evaluation of skin irritation of medical device extracts.
Pellevoisin C; Videau C; Briotet D; Grégoire C; Tornier C; Alonso A; Rigaudeau AS; Bouez C; Seyler N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():418-425. PubMed ID: 29339149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Property characterization of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents, and performance as a skin irritation model.
Capallere C; Plaza C; Meyrignac C; Arcioni M; Brulas M; Busuttil V; Garcia I; Bauza É; Botto JM
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Dec; 53():45-56. PubMed ID: 30053440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24.
Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A
J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictability of in vitro dermal assays when evaluating fatty amine derivatives.
Houthoff E; Rugen P; Hart D
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Sep; 29(6):1263-7. PubMed ID: 25458482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: A comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo testing results.
De Jong WH; Carraway JW; Liu C; Fan C; Liu J; Turley AP; Rollins TS; Coleman KP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():104995. PubMed ID: 32891721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]