These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29318899)

  • 1. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Borie E; Leal E; Orsi IA; Salamanca C; Dias FJ; Weber B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 29318899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compressive resistance of abutments with different diameters and transmucosal heights in Morse-taper implants.
    Lillo R; Parra C; Fuentes R; Borie E; Engelke W; Beltrán V
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 25831107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Silva GC; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Bueno AC; Moreira AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1479-88. PubMed ID: 25062583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Poletto-Neto V; Tretto PHW; Zen BM; Bacchi A; Dos Santos MBF
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 31429636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Martini AP; Freitas AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Kina S; Fasolo GB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):415-8. PubMed ID: 22421854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.