230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29319557)
1. Posterior Compartment Surgery Provides No Differential Benefit for Defecatory Symptoms Before or After Concomitant Mesh-Augmented Apical Suspension.
Arunachalam D; Hale DS; Heit MH
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):183-187. PubMed ID: 29319557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is postoperative bowel function related to posterior compartment prolapse repair?
Edenfield AL; Levin PJ; Dieter AA; Wu JM; Siddiqui NY
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 24566212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.
Grimes CL; Schimpf MO; Wieslander CK; Sleemi A; Doyle P; Wu YM; Singh R; Balk EM; Rahn DD;
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1433-1454. PubMed ID: 31256222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship of defecation symptoms and posterior vaginal wall prolapse in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Karjalainen PK; Mattsson NK; Nieminen K; Tolppanen AM; Jalkanen JT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):480.e1-480.e10. PubMed ID: 31128111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the impact of a posterior compartment procedure on symptoms of obstructed defecation and posterior vaginal compartment anatomy.
Grimes CL; Overholser RH; Xu R; Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Dyer KY; Menefee SA; Diwadkar GB; Lukacz ES
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 27230408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anorectal symptoms before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpoperineopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Ramanah R; Ballester M; Chereau E; Bui C; Rouzier R; Daraï E
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jun; 23(6):779-83. PubMed ID: 22258718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE.
Grimes CL; Lukacz ES; Gantz MG; Warren LK; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Richter HE; Jelovsek JE; Cundiff G; Fine P; Visco AG; Zhang M; Meikle S;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 25181375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective cohort study of bowel function after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Lewis C; Salamon C; Priestley JL; Gurshumov E; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 24566211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study.
Rudroff C; Madukkakuzhy J; Hernandez AV; Otten J; Ulrici C; Karapanos L; Ludwig S
BMC Surg; 2024 Jun; 24(1):185. PubMed ID: 38877450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.
Dandolu V; Akiyama M; Allenback G; Pathak P
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 27562466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy comparing polypropylene mesh with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Technique description and long term outcomes.
Kavallaris A; Zygouris D
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Nov; 39(8):2264-2271. PubMed ID: 32776608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse with and without urinary incontinence: A single center experience.
Cormio L; Mancini V; Liuzzi G; d'Altilia N; Carrieri G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(39):e7914. PubMed ID: 28953613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
