442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29320536)
1. Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.
Broberg G; Wang J; Östberg AL; Adolfsson A; Nemes S; Sparén P; Strander B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190171. PubMed ID: 29320536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.
Harder E; Juul KE; Jensen SM; Thomsen LT; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():94-100. PubMed ID: 29501474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance--ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial.
Alfonzo E; Andersson Ellström A; Nemes S; Strander B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150888. PubMed ID: 26986848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in cervical cancer screening between immigrants and nonimmigrants in Norway: a primary healthcare register-based study.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Qureshi S; Diaz E
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 Nov; 26(6):521-527. PubMed ID: 27749381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Sparén P
Prev Med; 2001 Jun; 32(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 11394952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Socio-demographic characteristics of participation in the opportunistic German cervical cancer screening programme: results from the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort.
Seidel D; Becker N; Rohrmann S; Nimptsch K; Linseisen J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 135(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 18841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical screening participation and risk among Swedish-born and immigrant women in Sweden.
Azerkan F; Sparén P; Sandin S; Tillgren P; Faxelid E; Zendehdel K
Int J Cancer; 2012 Feb; 130(4):937-47. PubMed ID: 21437898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When Life Got in the Way: How Danish and Norwegian Immigrant Women in Sweden Reason about Cervical Screening and Why They Postpone Attendance.
Azerkan F; Widmark C; Sparén P; Weiderpass E; Tillgren P; Faxelid E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0107624. PubMed ID: 26158449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.
Olesen SC; Butterworth P; Jacomb P; Tait RJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():34. PubMed ID: 22333392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.
Broberg G; Gyrd-Hansen D; Miao Jonasson J; Ryd ML; Holtenman M; Milsom I; Strander B
Int J Cancer; 2014 May; 134(9):2223-30. PubMed ID: 24127304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden.
Forss A; Tishelman C; Widmark C; Lundgren E; Sachs L; Törnberg S
Psychooncology; 2001; 10(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 11180579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparities in cervical screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population.
Idehen EE; Koponen P; Härkänen T; Kangasniemi M; Pietilä AM; Korhonen T
Int J Equity Health; 2018 May; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 29728104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening among young Koreans: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Chang HK; Myong JP; Byun SW; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Lee HN; Lee KH; Park DC; Kim CJ; Hur SY; Park JS; Park TC
BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e013868. PubMed ID: 28373252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Life-course socioeconomic status and breast and cervical cancer screening: analysis of the WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE).
Akinyemiju T; Ogunsina K; Sakhuja S; Ogbhodo V; Braithwaite D
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012753. PubMed ID: 27881528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-attendance of mammographic screening: the roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample.
Zidar MN; Larm P; Tillgren P; Akhavan S
Int J Equity Health; 2015 Dec; 14():157. PubMed ID: 26715453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
