116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29322896)
1. Influence of varus/valgus positioning of the Nanos® and Metha® short-stemmed prostheses on stress shielding of metaphyseal bone.
Brinkmann V; Radetzki F; Gutteck N; Delank S; Zeh A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2017 Mar; 83(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 29322896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos short-stemmed prosthesis.
Zeh A; Pankow F; Röllinhoff M; Delank S; Wohlrab D
Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Apr; 79(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 23821969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periprosthetic bone remodeling around short stem.
Synder M; Krajewski K; Sibinski M; Drobniewski M
Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S40-5. PubMed ID: 25826631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Yan SG; Weber P; Steinbrück A; Hua X; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
Int Orthop; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2077-2086. PubMed ID: 29178044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Lerch M; von der Haar-Tran A; Windhagen H; Behrens BA; Wefstaedt P; Stukenborg-Colsman CM
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 21935621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes of periprosthetic bone density after a cementless short hip stem: a clinical and radiological analysis.
Jahnke A; Engl S; Altmeyer C; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Rickert M; Ishaque BA
Int Orthop; 2014 Oct; 38(10):2045-50. PubMed ID: 25027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Our experience with the metha short hip stem].
Lacko M; Filip V; Cellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24755060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone integration of new stemless hip implants (proxima vs. nanos). A DXA study: preliminary results.
Logroscino G; Ciriello V; D'Antonio E; De Tullio V; Piciocco P; Magliocchetti Lombi G; Santori FS; Albanese CV
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2011; 24(1 Suppl 2):113-6. PubMed ID: 21669148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in 51 Patients After a Mean 8.2 Years Using the Nanos® Short-stem Prosthesis.
Fischer C; Dietz J; Delank KS; Zeh A; Wohlrab D
Surg Technol Int; 2021 Oct; 39():348-353. PubMed ID: 34699603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses.
Brinkmann V; Radetzki F; Delank KS; Wohlrab D; Zeh A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Sep; 16(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 25666724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.
Yan SG; Woiczinski M; Schmidutz TF; Weber P; Paulus AC; Steinbrück A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
Int Orthop; 2017 Dec; 41(12):2471-2477. PubMed ID: 28488162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of size and CCD-angle of a short stem hip arthroplasty on strain patterns of the proximal femur - an experimental study.
Floerkemeier T; Budde S; Hurschler C; Lewinski G; Windhagen H; Gronewold J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 28552922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Huang Q; Shen B; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1811-5. PubMed ID: 23618750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.
Floerkemeier T; Gronewold J; Berner S; Olender G; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G
Int Orthop; 2013 Mar; 37(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 23271689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early Subsidence Predicts Failure of a Cemented Femoral Stem With Minor Design Changes.
Johanson PE; Antonsson M; Shareghi B; Kärrholm J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2221-9. PubMed ID: 27188836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of periprosthetic bone mass density around the cementless Metha® short hip stem during three year follow up-a prospective radiological and clinical study.
Augustin L; Boller S; Bobach C; Jahnke A; Ahmed GA; Rickert M; Ishaque BA
Int Orthop; 2019 Sep; 43(9):2031-2037. PubMed ID: 30178069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H
Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
