These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29323133)

  • 1. The effect of image position on the Independent Components of natural binocular images.
    Hunter DW; Hibbard PB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):449. PubMed ID: 29323133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Carkeet A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1584616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular recognition summation in the peripheral visual field: contrast and orientation dependence.
    Pardhan S
    Vision Res; 2003 May; 43(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 12726831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
    Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic cooperation between the fovea of one eye and the periphery of the other eye at large disparities. Implications for anomalous retinal correspondence in strabismus.
    Dengler B; Kommerell G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 231(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 8486300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binocular Disparity Selectivity Weakened after Monocular Deprivation in Mouse V1.
    Scholl B; Pattadkal JJ; Priebe NJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(27):6517-6526. PubMed ID: 28576937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.
    Ghahghaei S; McKee S; Verghese P
    J Vis; 2019 Sep; 19(11):3. PubMed ID: 31480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term dysfunctions of neural stereoscopic mechanisms after unilateral extraocular muscle proprioceptive deafferentation.
    Trotter Y; Celebrini S; Beaux JC; Grandjean B; Imbert M
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1513-29. PubMed ID: 8509829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
    O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of independent components of binocular natural images.
    Hunter DW; Hibbard PB
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):6. PubMed ID: 26381837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An unexpected specialization for horizontal disparity in primate primary visual cortex.
    Cumming BG
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):633-6. PubMed ID: 12167860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of induced fixation disparity on binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Pickwell LD; Abd-Manan F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 1454366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular Versus Binocular Calibrations in Evaluating Fixation Disparity With a Video-Based Eye-Tracker.
    Švede A; Treija E; Jaschinski W; Krūmiņa G
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1110-28. PubMed ID: 26562925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.