195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29323232)
1. Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls.
Fuller TW; Acharya AP; Meyyappan T; Yu M; Bhaskar G; Little SR; Tarin TV
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):507. PubMed ID: 29323232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of three carcinogenic aromatic amines in urine of smokers and nonsmokers.
Riedel K; Scherer G; Engl J; Hagedorn HW; Tricker AR
J Anal Toxicol; 2006 Apr; 30(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 16803653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinogen Biomarkers in the Urine of Electronic Cigarette Users and Implications for the Development of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Bjurlin MA; Matulewicz RS; Roberts TR; Dearing BA; Schatz D; Sherman S; Gordon T; Shahawy OE
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):766-783. PubMed ID: 32192941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette consumers.
Schober W; Szendrei K; Matzen W; Osiander-Fuchs H; Heitmann D; Schettgen T; Jörres RA; Fromme H
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2014 Jul; 217(6):628-37. PubMed ID: 24373737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of carcinogenic aromatic amines in the urine of non-smokers.
Grimmer G; Dettbarn G; Seidel A; Jacob J
Sci Total Environ; 2000 Feb; 247(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.
Hoffmann D; Hoffmann I
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Mar; 50(4):307-64. PubMed ID: 9120872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of exposure to selected cigarette smoke constituents in adult smokers and nonsmokers in a European, multicenter, observational study.
Lindner D; Smith S; Leroy CM; Tricker AR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1524-36. PubMed ID: 21613391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary cotinine levels of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) users.
Göney G; Çok İ; Tamer U; Burgaz S; Şengezer T
Toxicol Mech Methods; 2016 Jul; 26(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 27278718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification and quantitative determination of aniline and toluidines in human urine.
el-Bayoumy K; Donahue JM; Hecht SS; Hoffmann D
Cancer Res; 1986 Dec; 46(12 Pt 1):6064-7. PubMed ID: 3779628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid and simultaneous analysis of ten aromatic amines in mainstream cigarette smoke by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry under ISO and "Health Canada intensive" machine smoking regimens.
Xie F; Yu J; Wang S; Zhao G; Xia Q; Zhang X; Zhang S
Talanta; 2013 Oct; 115():435-41. PubMed ID: 24054615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liquid Chromatography-Nanoelectrospray Ionization-High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Sites in Oral Cell DNA of Cigarette Smokers, e-Cigarette Users, and Nonsmokers.
Guo J; Ikuemonisan J; Hatsukami DK; Hecht SS
Chem Res Toxicol; 2021 Dec; 34(12):2540-2548. PubMed ID: 34846846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of 2,5-toluylenediamine (2,5-TDA) and aromatic amines in urine after personal application of hair dyes: kinetics and doses.
Schettgen T; Heinrich K; Kraus T; Gube M
Arch Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 85(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20549195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased acrolein-DNA adducts in buccal brushings of e-cigarette users.
Cheng G; Guo J; Carmella SG; Lindgren B; Ikuemonisan J; Niesen B; Jensen J; Hatsukami DK; Balbo S; Hecht SS
Carcinogenesis; 2022 Jun; 43(5):437-444. PubMed ID: 35239969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of urinary aromatic amines in smokers and nonsmokers using a MIPs-SPE coupled with LC-MS/MS method.
Yu J; Wang S; Zhao G; Wang B; Ding L; Zhang X; Xie J; Xie F
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2014 May; 958():130-5. PubMed ID: 24735928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. College students' perceptions of risk and addictiveness of e-cigarettes and cigarettes.
Cooper M; Loukas A; Harrell MB; Perry CL
J Am Coll Health; 2017; 65(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 27805472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of 10 carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream cigarette smoke.
Ding YS; Ashley DL; Watson CH
J Agric Food Chem; 2007 Jul; 55(15):5966-73. PubMed ID: 17602652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monoarylamines in the general population--a cross-sectional population-based study including 1004 Bavarian subjects.
Kütting B; Göen T; Schwegler U; Fromme H; Uter W; Angerer J; Drexler H
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2009 May; 212(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 18789761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with dual use of tobacco and electronic cigarettes: A case control study.
Farsalinos KE; Romagna G; Voudris V
Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Jun; 26(6):595-600. PubMed ID: 25687714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do electronic cigarettes impart a lower potential disease burden than conventional tobacco cigarettes? Review on E-cigarette vapor versus tobacco smoke.
Oh AY; Kacker A
Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2702-6. PubMed ID: 25302452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency of E-cigarette Use, Health Status, and Risk and Protective Health Behaviors in Adolescents.
Dunbar MS; Tucker JS; Ewing BA; Pedersen ER; Miles JN; Shih RA; D'Amico EJ
J Addict Med; 2017; 11(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 27898495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
