These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29324049)

  • 1. Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.
    Deng S; E McCarthy D; E Piper M; B Baker T; Bolt DM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 29324049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
    Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
    Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.
    Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style.
    Lubbe D; Schuster C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):616-629. PubMed ID: 28846032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 31292952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Japanese response bias: Cross-level and cross-national comparisons on response styles].
    Tasaki K; Shin J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2017 Apr; 88(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 29630308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of successful smoking cessation by psychological factors using the Bayesian network approach.
    Yang X; Li S; Pan L; Wang Q; Li H; Han M; Zhang N; Jiang F; Jia C
    Psychol Health Med; 2016 Jul; 21(5):652-61. PubMed ID: 26264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra-individual variation of extreme response style in mixed-mode panel studies.
    Aichholzer J
    Soc Sci Res; 2013 May; 42(3):957-70. PubMed ID: 23522006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extracting Response Style Bias From Measures of Positive and Negative Affect in Aging Research.
    Schneider S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Dec; 73(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 27543081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.
    Wetzel E; Böhnke JR; Rose N
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):304-324. PubMed ID: 29795867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Response Styles Affect Estimates of Growth on Social-Emotional Constructs? Evidence from Four Years of Longitudinal Survey Scores.
    Soland J; Kuhfeld M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(6):853-873. PubMed ID: 32633574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.
    Khorramdel L; von Davier M; Pokropek A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):538-559. PubMed ID: 31385610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different Styles, Different Times: How Response Times Can Inform Our Knowledge About the Response Process in Rating Scale Measurement.
    Henninger M; Plieninger H
    Assessment; 2021 Jul; 28(5):1301-1319. PubMed ID: 31976748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.
    Ames AJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):281-306. PubMed ID: 35185160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting response time on self-report rating scale assessments of noncognitive constructs.
    Lyu W; Bolt DM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1123-1139. PubMed ID: 37604960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles.
    Falk CF; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):328-47. PubMed ID: 26641273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
    Park M; Wu AD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):911-930. PubMed ID: 31488919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.