These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29324639)

  • 1. Depopulation of Caged Layer Hens with a Compressed Air Foam System.
    Gurung S; Hoffman J; Stringfellow K; Abi-Ghanem D; Zhao D; Caldwell D; Lee J; Styles D; Berghman L; Byrd J; Farnell Y; Archer G; Farnell M
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29324639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Infused Compressed Air Foam for Depopulation of Caged Laying Hens.
    Gurung S; White D; Archer G; Styles D; Zhao D; Farnell Y; Byrd J; Farnell M
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29301340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Two Compressed Air Foam Systems for Culling Caged Layer Hens.
    Benson ER; Weiher JA; Alphin RL; Farnell M; Hougentogler DP
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Apr; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 29695072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass depopulation of laying hens in whole barns with liquid carbon dioxide: evaluation of welfare impact.
    Turner PV; Kloeze H; Dam A; Ward D; Leung N; Brown EE; Whiteman A; Chiappetta ME; Hunter DB
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jul; 91(7):1558-68. PubMed ID: 22700499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mass emergency water-based foam depopulation of poultry.
    Benson ER; Alphin RL; Rankin MK; Caputo MP; Hougentogler DP; Johnson AL
    Avian Dis; 2012 Dec; 56(4 Suppl):891-6. PubMed ID: 23402109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foam-based mass emergency depopulation of floor-reared meat-type poultry operations.
    Benson E; Malone GW; Alphin RL; Dawson MD; Pope CR; Van Wicklen GL
    Poult Sci; 2007 Feb; 86(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 17234833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Retrospective Study of Early
    Nezworski J; St Charles KM; Malladi S; Ssematimba A; Bonney PJ; Cardona CJ; Halvorson DA; Culhane MR
    Avian Dis; 2021 Sep; 65(3):474-482. PubMed ID: 34699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Gaseous and Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Methods in Cull Sows.
    Lorbach JN; Campler MR; Youngblood B; Farnell MB; Beyene TJ; Kieffer J; Moeller SJ; Arruda AG; Bowman AS
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34827911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Risk of Highly Pathogenic Influenza A Virus Transmission to Turkey Hen Flocks Through Artificial Insemination.
    Cardona C; Wileman B; Malladi S; Ceballos R; Culhane M; Munoz-Aguayo J; Flores-Figueroa C; Halvorson D; Walz E; Charles KS; Bonney P; Ssematimba A; Goldsmith T
    Avian Dis; 2021 Jun; 65(2):303-309. PubMed ID: 34412462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of water-based foam and carbon dioxide gas mass emergency depopulation of White Pekin ducks.
    Caputo MP; Benson ER; Pritchett EM; Hougentogler DP; Jain P; Patil C; Johnson AL; Alphin RL
    Poult Sci; 2012 Dec; 91(12):3057-64. PubMed ID: 23155013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avian influenza outbreak management: action at time of confirmation, depopulation and disposal methods; the 'Belgian experience' during the H7N7 highly pathogenic avian influenza epidemic in 2003.
    van den Berg T; Houdart P
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 18201328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of water-based foam and carbon dioxide gas emergency depopulation methods of turkeys.
    Rankin MK; Alphin RL; Benson ER; Johnson AL; Hougentogler DP; Mohankumar P
    Poult Sci; 2013 Dec; 92(12):3144-8. PubMed ID: 24235223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental Sampling Survey of H5N2 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza-Infected Layer Chicken Farms in Minnesota and Iowa.
    Lopez KM; Nezworski J; Rendahl A; Culhane M; Flores-Figueroa C; Muñoz-Aguayo J; Halvorson DA; Johnson R; Goldsmith T; Cardona CJ
    Avian Dis; 2018 Dec; 62(4):373-380. PubMed ID: 31119921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages.
    Albentosa MJ; Cooper JJ; Luddem T; Redgate SE; Elson HA; Walker AW
    Br Poult Sci; 2007 Feb; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17364534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electroencephalogram-based methodology for determining unconsciousness during depopulation.
    Benson ER; Alphin RL; Rankin MK; Caputo MP; Johnson AL
    Avian Dis; 2012 Dec; 56(4 Suppl):884-90. PubMed ID: 23402108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors.
    Thøfner ICN; Dahl J; Christensen JP
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256105. PubMed ID: 34388183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis.
    Webster AB
    Poult Sci; 2004 Feb; 83(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 14979568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Ghana, 2015: degree of losses and outcomes of time-course outbreak management.
    Tasiame W; Johnson S; Burimuah V; Akyereko E; El-Duah P; Amemor E; Emikpe BO; Owiredu EW
    Epidemiol Infect; 2020 Feb; 148():e45. PubMed ID: 32063239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance, behavior, plasma corticosterone, and economic returns of laying hens in several management alternatives.
    Koelkebeck KW; Cain JR
    Poult Sci; 1984 Nov; 63(11):2123-31. PubMed ID: 6514660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.