487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29325040)
21. Genetic engineering of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Le Borgne S
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 824():451-65. PubMed ID: 22160914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bioethanol strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae characterised by microsatellite and stress resistance.
Reis VR; Antonangelo ATBF; Bassi APG; Colombi D; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Braz J Microbiol; 2017; 48(2):268-274. PubMed ID: 28057426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enhanced xylose fermentation by engineered yeast expressing NADH oxidase through high cell density inoculums.
Zhang GC; Turner TL; Jin YS
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Mar; 44(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28070721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Towards efficient bioethanol production from agricultural and forestry residues: Exploration of unique natural microorganisms in combination with advanced strain engineering.
Zhao X; Xiong L; Zhang M; Bai F
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 215():84-91. PubMed ID: 27067672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Xylose fermentation efficiency and inhibitor tolerance of the recombinant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain NAPX37.
Li YC; Mitsumasu K; Gou ZX; Gou M; Tang YQ; Li GY; Wu XL; Akamatsu T; Taguchi H; Kida K
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Feb; 100(3):1531-1542. PubMed ID: 26603762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations.
Pereira FB; Guimarães PM; Teixeira JA; Domingues L
J Biosci Bioeng; 2011 Aug; 112(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 21543257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic alcoholic fermentation of L-arabinose.
Wisselink HW; Toirkens MJ; del Rosario Franco Berriel M; Winkler AA; van Dijken JP; Pronk JT; van Maris AJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 73(15):4881-91. PubMed ID: 17545317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing laboratory and industrial yeast platforms for the direct conversion of cellobiose into ethanol under simulated industrial conditions.
Cagnin L; Favaro L; Gronchi N; Rose SH; Basaglia M; van Zyl WH; Casella S
FEMS Yeast Res; 2019 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 30776068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethanol production process driving changes on industrial strains.
Nagamatsu ST; Coutouné N; José J; Fiamenghi MB; Pereira GAG; Oliveira JVC; Carazzolle MF
FEMS Yeast Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33417685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Physiological characterization of thermotolerant yeast for cellulosic ethanol production.
Costa DA; de Souza CJ; Costa PS; Rodrigues MQ; dos Santos AF; Lopes MR; Genier HL; Silveira WB; Fietto LG
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 98(8):3829-40. PubMed ID: 24535257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Continuous co-fermentation of cellobiose and xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ha SJ; Kim SR; Kim H; Du J; Cate JH; Jin YS
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 149():525-31. PubMed ID: 24140899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening and construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved multi-tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance.
Zheng DQ; Wu XC; Tao XL; Wang PM; Li P; Chi XQ; Li YD; Yan QF; Zhao YH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):3020-7. PubMed ID: 20980141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Saccharomyces cerevisiae variety diastaticus friend or foe?-spoilage potential and brewing ability of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae variety diastaticus yeast isolates by genetic, phenotypic and physiological characterization.
Meier-Dörnberg T; Kory OI; Jacob F; Michel M; Hutzler M
FEMS Yeast Res; 2018 Jun; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29518233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.
Jansen MLA; Bracher JM; Papapetridis I; Verhoeven MD; de Bruijn H; de Waal PP; van Maris AJA; Klaassen P; Pronk JT
FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Aug; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 28899031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Looking beyond Saccharomyces: the potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation.
Radecka D; Mukherjee V; Mateo RQ; Stojiljkovic M; Foulquié-Moreno MR; Thevelein JM
FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 Sep; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 26126524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stress-related challenges in pentose fermentation to ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Almeida JR; Runquist D; Sànchez i Nogué V; Lidén G; Gorwa-Grauslund MF
Biotechnol J; 2011 Mar; 6(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 21305697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gene Amplification on Demand Accelerates Cellobiose Utilization in Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Oh EJ; Skerker JM; Kim SR; Wei N; Turner TL; Maurer MJ; Arkin AP; Jin YS
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 82(12):3631-3639. PubMed ID: 27084006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced ethanol tolerance for Chinese rice wine fermentation.
Chen S; Xu Y
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2014 Aug; 173(7):1940-54. PubMed ID: 24879599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioprospecting thermotolerant ethanologenic yeasts for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation from diverse environments.
Choudhary J; Singh S; Nain L
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Mar; 123(3):342-346. PubMed ID: 27856231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil.
Basso LC; de Amorim HV; de Oliveira AJ; Lopes ML
FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1155-63. PubMed ID: 18752628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
