BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29325176)

  • 1. Dynamic motif occupancy (DynaMO) analysis identifies transcription factors and their binding sites driving dynamic biological processes.
    Kuang Z; Ji Z; Boeke JD; Ji H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(1):e2. PubMed ID: 29325176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of Co-Associated Transcription Factors via Ordered Adjacency Differences on Motif Distribution.
    Pan G; Tang J; Guo F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43597. PubMed ID: 28240320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COPS: detecting co-occurrence and spatial arrangement of transcription factor binding motifs in genome-wide datasets.
    Ha N; Polychronidou M; Lohmann I
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52055. PubMed ID: 23272209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inferring dynamic gene regulatory networks in cardiac differentiation through the integration of multi-dimensional data.
    Gong W; Koyano-Nakagawa N; Li T; Garry DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():74. PubMed ID: 25887857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
    Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneously learning DNA motif along with its position and sequence rank preferences through expectation maximization algorithm.
    Zhang Z; Chang CW; Hugo W; Cheung E; Sung WK
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 23461573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.
    Lai FJ; Jhu MH; Chiu CC; Huang YM; Wu WS
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25559499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
    Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Weighted enrichment method for prediction of transcription regulators from transcriptome and global chromatin immunoprecipitation data.
    Kawakami E; Nakaoka S; Ohta T; Kitano H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jun; 44(11):5010-21. PubMed ID: 27131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. THiCweed: fast, sensitive detection of sequence features by clustering big datasets.
    Agrawal A; Sambare SV; Narlikar L; Siddharthan R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Mar; 46(5):e29. PubMed ID: 29267972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A graphical model approach visualizes regulatory relationships between genome-wide transcription factor binding profiles.
    Ng FSL; Ruau D; Wernisch L; Göttgens B
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jan; 19(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 27780826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of chromatin and transcriptional co-regulators in mediating p63-genome interactions in keratinocytes.
    Sethi I; Sinha S; Buck MJ
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):1042. PubMed ID: 25433490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.