BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

965 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29325321)

  • 21. Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.
    Han L; He G; Mei Y; Yu Q; Zhao M; Luo F; Cheng G; Liang W
    Med Sci Monit; 2022 Apr; 28():e935307. PubMed ID: 35459760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PI-RADS v2.1 Combined With Prostate-Specific Antigen Density for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Peripheral Zone.
    Wen J; Tang T; Ji Y; Zhang Y
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():861928. PubMed ID: 35463349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The diagnostic value of version 2.1 prostate imaging reporting and data system for prostate transitional zone lesions].
    Yang S; Zhang CY; Zhang YY; Tan SX; Wei CG; Shen XH; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 33333685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PSA density is complementary to prostate MP-MRI PI-RADS scoring system for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Frisbie JW; Van Besien AJ; Lee A; Xu L; Wang S; Choksi A; Afzal MA; Naslund MJ; Lane B; Wong J; Wnorowski A; Siddiqui MM
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study.
    Massanova M; Vere R; Robertson S; Crocetto F; Barone B; Dutto L; Ahmad I; Underwood M; Salmond J; Patel A; Celentano G; Bhatt JR
    Curr Urol; 2023 Sep; 17(3):147-152. PubMed ID: 37448611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the detection rate of prostate cancer in the gray zone of PI-RADS v2 and serum tPSA by using prostate-specific antigen-age volume.
    Lu YF; Zhang Q; Chen HY; Chen JY; Pan Y; Xu CC; Xu JX; Yu RS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(26):e16289. PubMed ID: 31261602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.
    Brizmohun Appayya M; Sidhu HS; Dikaios N; Johnston EW; Simmons LA; Freeman A; Kirkham AP; Ahmed HU; Punwani S
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1083):20170645. PubMed ID: 29189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhu YC; Huang YXR; Guo Q; Tian Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 29859119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Wen J; Liu W; Shen X; Hu W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6570. PubMed ID: 38503972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria R; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3109-3116. PubMed ID: 29550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Differentiation of prostatitis and clinically significant prostate cancer in peripheral zone using the prostate imaging-reporting and data system].
    Zhang TH; Hu CH; Chen JX; Xu ZD; Hu YJ; Cai HF; Shen LP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 99(31):2455-2458. PubMed ID: 31434427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A calculator based on prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) is a promising prostate cancer predictor.
    Wang H; Tai S; Zhang L; Zhou J; Liang C
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):6870. PubMed ID: 31053749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
    Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishing a novel prediction model for improving the positive rate of prostate biopsy.
    Tao T; Shen D; Yuan L; Zeng A; Xia K; Li B; Ge Q; Xiao J
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Apr; 9(2):574-582. PubMed ID: 32420162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient-related characteristics predict prostate cancers in men with PI-RADS 4-5 to further optimize the diagnostic performance of MRI.
    Xiang L; Ma S; Xu Y; Jiang L; Guo H; Liu H; Liu Y
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Dec; 48(12):3766-3773. PubMed ID: 37776336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.