These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2932554)

  • 1. The 'baby Brown' case and the Dr Arthur verdict.
    Davis JA
    J Med Ethics; 1985 Sep; 11(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 2932554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal notes: the trial of Dr. Arthur.
    Bailey E
    Nurs Focus; 1982 Jun; 3(10):183-4. PubMed ID: 6212781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symposium 1: The Arthur case--a proposal for legislation.
    Brahams D; Brahams M
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Mar; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6220153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.
    Raphael DD
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 2965246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reg. v. Dr. Leonard Arthur: a "post mortem" analysis.
    Gerber P
    Med J Aust; 1982 Apr; 1(7):285-6. PubMed ID: 11643755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. After the trial at Leicester.
    Lancet; 1981 Nov; 2(8255):1085-6. PubMed ID: 6118528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Against infanticide.
    Keyserlingk EW
    Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):154-7. PubMed ID: 3645225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infanticide, physicians, and the law: the "Baby Doe" amendments to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act.
    Lund N
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 3832943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parental choice and selective non-treatment of deformed newborns: a view from mid-Atlantic.
    Mason JK; Meyers DW
    J Med Ethics; 1986 Jun; 12(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 2942688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infanticide and its apologists.
    Tedeschi M
    Commentary; 1984 Nov; 78(5):31-5. PubMed ID: 11658565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience.
    Merrick JC
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introduction to philosophical medical ethics: the Arthur case.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Apr; 290(6475):1117-9. PubMed ID: 3157420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arthur's case and the right to life of a Down's syndrome child.
    Gunn MJ; Smith JC
    Crim Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 1985():705-15. PubMed ID: 11651793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Philosophical medical ethics. Conclusion: the Arthur case revisited.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6519):543-5. PubMed ID: 2936424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Arthur case.
    Potter J
    Lancet; 1982 Jan; 1(8262):56. PubMed ID: 11644219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surveying the foundations of medical law: a reassessment of Glanville Williams's the sanctity of life and the criminal law.
    Keown J; Jones D
    Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(1):85-126. PubMed ID: 18305065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A killing of Baby Doe.
    Harris LS
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Nov; 42(6):1180-2. PubMed ID: 9397566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNR in the DR?
    Yellin PB; Fleischman AR
    J Perinatol; 1995; 15(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 7666274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infanticide and medico-legal ethics in eighteenth century Prussia.
    Geyer-Kordesch J
    Clio Med; 1993; 24():181-202. PubMed ID: 7516840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The legal threat to medicine reconsidered.
    Mason JK
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1993 Jan; 22(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 8503647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.