These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29325888)

  • 21. Hertel exophthalmometer versus computed tomography scan in proptosis estimation in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
    Park NR; Moon JH; Lee JK
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1461-1467. PubMed ID: 31447545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Utilizing a mobile platform to obtain quantitative measurements of exophthalmos.
    Magazin M; Tran AQ; Tooley AA
    Orbit; 2022 Oct; 41(5):591-597. PubMed ID: 34542003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Value of Multidetector Computed Tomography of Orbits in Globe Protrusion in Comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometry.
    Đorić I; Žarković M; Radojičić Z; Repac N; Janićijević A; Rotim K; Tasić G; Rasulić L
    Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Mar; 56(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29120123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Naugle and Hertel instruments.
    Cole HP; Couvillion JT; Fink AJ; Haik BG; Kastl PR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Sep; 13(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9306438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of exophthalmos magnetic resonance imaging measurements in patients with Graves' orbitopathy, compared to ophthalmometry results.
    Wnuk E; Maj E; Jabłońska-Pawlak A; Jeczeń M; Rowińska-Berman K; Rowiński O
    Pol J Radiol; 2022; 87():e539-e544. PubMed ID: 36250144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of Modified Hertel Exophthalmometer.
    Jamal RF; Azariah E; Pandyan D; Chinnaswami R
    Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2021 Sep; 14(3):174-182. PubMed ID: 34471472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interinstrument variability in Hertel-type exophthalmometers.
    Sleep TJ; Manners RM
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 18(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 12142756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Novel Method of CT Exophthalmometry in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease.
    Tiong TYV; Sundar G; Young SM; Makmur A; Yong HRC; Wong YLJ; Lang SS; Tan AP
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2020; 9(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 31990744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exophthalmometry value distribution in healthy Lithuanian children and adolescents.
    Jarusaitiene D; Lisicova J; Krucaite A; Jankauskiene J
    Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2016; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 27330383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intraoperative noncontact, nonionizing, optical 3D exophthalmometry during repositioning of dislocated globes: first results.
    Kramer M; Maier T; Benz M; Holbach LM; Häusler G; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 64(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 16713804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hertel exophthalmometry without orbital rim contact.
    Kratky V; Hurwitz JJ
    Ophthalmology; 1994 May; 101(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 8190483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computed Tomography Exophthalmometry.
    Hauck MJ; Tao JP; Burgett RA
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010 Mar; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 20337291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of globe position in complex orbital fractures. I. A modification of Hertel's exophthalmometer, using the external auditory canal as a reference point.
    Yeatts RP; van Rens E; Taylor CL
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992; 8(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 1520652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed Tomography Exophthalmometry.
    Hauck MJ; Tao JP; Burgett RA
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010 Mar; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 20349894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparative Study of Clinical vs. Digital Exophthalmometry Measurement Methods.
    Pereira TS; Kuniyoshi CH; Leite CA; Gebrim EMMS; Monteiro MLR; Pieroni Gonçalves AC
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():1397410. PubMed ID: 32280513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exophthalmometric values in a normal Turkish population living in the northeastern part of Turkey.
    Bilen H; Gullulu G; Akcay G
    Thyroid; 2007 Jun; 17(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 17614772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comparison of Lower Eyelid Retraction in Normal Individuals with Positive versus Negative Orbital Vector.
    Rajabi MT; Malmir M; Mahmoudzadeh R; Salabati M; Tabatabaie SZ; Rajabi MB; Hosseini SS
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2020; 27(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 32549720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hertel exophthalmometry: reliability and interobserver variation.
    Kashkouli MB; Beigi B; Noorani MM; Nojoomi M
    Orbit; 2003 Dec; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 14685897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of contemporary tools for the measurement of enophthalmos: a PRISMA-driven systematic review.
    Nightingale CL; Shakib K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 57(9):904-912. PubMed ID: 31431316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Pythagorean theorem.
    Zhang W; Zeng J; Huang Q; Liu Z; Li J
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 31(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 31986913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.