These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29325889)

  • 1. Early cell response of osteogenic cells on differently modified implant surfaces: Sequences of cell proliferation, adherence and differentiation.
    Blatt S; Pabst AM; Schiegnitz E; Hosang M; Ziebart T; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Klein MO
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 29325889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation.
    Klein MO; Bijelic A; Ziebart T; Koch F; Kämmerer PW; Wieland M; Konerding MA; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 21682843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron-scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation.
    Klein MO; Bijelic A; Toyoshima T; Götz H; von Koppenfels RL; Al-Nawas B; Duschner H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 20666791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Implant Material and Surface on Differentiation and Proliferation of Human Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells.
    Jung S; Bohner L; Hanisch M; Kleinheinz J; Sielker S
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Dec; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 30551618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.
    Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C
    Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Novel Laser Dental Implant Microtopography on Human Osteoblast Proliferation and Bone Deposition.
    Mastrangelo F; Quaresima R; Canullo L; Scarano A; Muzio LL; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):320-329. PubMed ID: 32142569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The response of osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells to modified titanium surfaces.
    Pivodova V; Frankova J; Dolezel P; Ulrichova J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24066332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control of dental-derived induced pluripotent stem cells through modified surfaces for dental application.
    Choi H; Park KH; Lee AR; Mun CH; Shin YD; Park YB; Park YB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Jul; 75(5):309-318. PubMed ID: 28335666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteogenic potential of bone marrow stromal cells on smooth, roughened, and tricalcium phosphate-modified titanium alloy surfaces.
    Colombo JS; Carley A; Fleming GJ; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1029-42. PubMed ID: 23057015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Galli C; Piemontese M; Ravanetti F; Lumetti S; Passeri G; Gandolfini M; Macaluso GM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 22640672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early implant healing: promotion of platelet activation and cytokine release by topographical, chemical and biomimetical titanium surface modifications in vitro.
    Kämmerer PW; Gabriel M; Al-Nawas B; Scholz T; Kirchmaier CM; Klein MO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 21435015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells.
    Knabe C; Howlett CR; Klar F; Zreiqat H
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells on surface-modified titanium alloys for orthopedic and dental implants.
    Giannoni P; Muraglia A; Giordano C; Narcisi R; Cancedda R; Quarto R; Chiesa R
    Int J Artif Organs; 2009 Nov; 32(11):811-20. PubMed ID: 20020413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
    Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
    Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
    Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.