These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2013 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29326075)

  • 41. The CRISPR/Cas9 system: Their delivery, in vivo and ex vivo applications and clinical development by startups.
    Song M
    Biotechnol Prog; 2017 Jul; 33(4):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 28440027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in Sorghum Through Biolistic Bombardment.
    Liu G; Li J; Godwin ID
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1931():169-183. PubMed ID: 30652290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Assisted Cytidine Deaminase Enable Precise and Efficient Genome Editing in Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    Wang Y; Wang S; Chen W; Song L; Zhang Y; Shen Z; Yu F; Li M; Ji Q
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Advances in therapeutic application of CRISPR-Cas9.
    Sun J; Wang J; Zheng D; Hu X
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2020 May; 19(3):164-174. PubMed ID: 31769791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CRISPR/Cas9 in zebrafish: an efficient combination for human genetic diseases modeling.
    Liu J; Zhou Y; Qi X; Chen J; Chen W; Qiu G; Wu Z; Wu N
    Hum Genet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27807677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems: Current achievements and future directions.
    Choi KR; Lee SY
    Biotechnol Adv; 2016 Nov; 34(7):1180-1209. PubMed ID: 27566508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Advance genome editing technologies in the treatment of human diseases: CRISPR therapy (Review).
    Alagoz M; Kherad N
    Int J Mol Med; 2020 Aug; 46(2):521-534. PubMed ID: 32467995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing in Plants.
    Zhang Y; Ma X; Xie X; Liu YG
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():133-150. PubMed ID: 28712494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing.
    Xiang G; Zhang X; An C; Cheng C; Wang H
    J Genet Genomics; 2017 Apr; 44(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 28412228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Efficient Genome Engineering of a Virulent Klebsiella Bacteriophage Using CRISPR-Cas9.
    Shen J; Zhou J; Chen GQ; Xiu ZL
    J Virol; 2018 Sep; 92(17):. PubMed ID: 29899105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Current situation of biofuel production and its enhancement by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering of microbial cells.
    Javed MR; Noman M; Shahid M; Ahmed T; Khurshid M; Rashid MH; Ismail M; Sadaf M; Khan F
    Microbiol Res; 2019 Feb; 219():1-11. PubMed ID: 30642460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. CRISPR/Cas9 Platforms for Genome Editing in Plants: Developments and Applications.
    Ma X; Zhu Q; Chen Y; Liu YG
    Mol Plant; 2016 Jul; 9(7):961-74. PubMed ID: 27108381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. CRISPR-Cas9 System: Opportunities and Concerns.
    Vasiliou SK; Diamandis EP; Church GM; Greely HT; Baylis F; Thompson C; Schmitt-Ulms G
    Clin Chem; 2016 Oct; 62(10):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27551006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Increasing the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-VQR precise genome editing in rice.
    Hu X; Meng X; Liu Q; Li J; Wang K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2018 Jan; 16(1):292-297. PubMed ID: 28605576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cas9 immunity creates challenges for CRISPR gene editing therapies.
    Crudele JM; Chamberlain JS
    Nat Commun; 2018 Aug; 9(1):3497. PubMed ID: 30158648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Targeted mutagenesis in wheat microspores using CRISPR/Cas9.
    Bhowmik P; Ellison E; Polley B; Bollina V; Kulkarni M; Ghanbarnia K; Song H; Gao C; Voytas DF; Kagale S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6502. PubMed ID: 29695804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can genetic engineering-based methods for gene function identification be eclipsed by genome editing in plants? A comparison of methodologies.
    Amritha PP; Shah JM
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 May; 296(3):485-500. PubMed ID: 33751237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exogenous gene integration mediated by genome editing technologies in zebrafish.
    Morita H; Taimatsu K; Yanagi K; Kawahara A
    Bioengineered; 2017 May; 8(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 28272984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Extending CRISPR-Cas9 Technology from Genome Editing to Transcriptional Engineering in the Genus Clostridium.
    Bruder MR; Pyne ME; Moo-Young M; Chung DA; Chou CP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 82(20):6109-6119. PubMed ID: 27496775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robust genome editing of CRISPR-Cas9 at NAG PAMs in rice.
    Meng X; Hu X; Liu Q; Song X; Gao C; Li J; Wang K
    Sci China Life Sci; 2018 Jan; 61(1):122-125. PubMed ID: 29285711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 101.