These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29326639)

  • 61. Building syntactic structure in speaking.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1999 Jan; 28(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 9949715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?
    Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 20034624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Error-based structure prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from verb bias effects in a visual-world structural priming paradigm for Mandarin Chinese.
    Chen X; Wang S; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 34410806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look.
    Do ML; Kaiser E
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1851. PubMed ID: 29118726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Animacy or case marker order?: priority information for online sentence comprehension in a head-final language.
    Yokoyama S; Takahashi K; Kawashima R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e93109. PubMed ID: 24664132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Pitch accents create dissociable syntactic and semantic expectations during sentence processing.
    van der Burght CL; Friederici AD; Goucha T; Hartwigsen G
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104702. PubMed ID: 33857845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Syntactic priming in American Sign Language.
    Hall ML; Ferreira VS; Mayberry RI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119611. PubMed ID: 25786230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.
    Schipke CS; Knoll LJ; Friederici AD; Oberecker R
    Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 23106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effects of discourse coherence on the persistence of sentence structures.
    Zhang C; Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):137-160. PubMed ID: 37883052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Repeating words in sentences: effects of sentence structure.
    Wheeldon LR; Smith MC; Apperly IA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1051-64. PubMed ID: 21517223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.
    Kuperberg GR; Choi A; Cohn N; Paczynski M; Jackendoff R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2685-701. PubMed ID: 19702471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Resolving conflicting cues in processing of ambiguous words: The role of case, word order, and animacy.
    Edeleva J; Chrabaszcz A; Demareva V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1173-1188. PubMed ID: 31931667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Asymmetric Morphological Priming Among Inflected and Derived Verbs and Nouns in Greek.
    Loui S; Protopapas A; Orfanidou E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():658189. PubMed ID: 34867572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Using lexical semantic cues to mitigate interference effects during real-time sentence processing in aphasia.
    Akhavan N; Blumenfeld HK; Shapiro L; Love T
    J Neurolinguistics; 2023 Nov; 68():. PubMed ID: 37946740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects.
    Scherag A; Demuth L; Rösler F; Neville HJ; Röder B
    Cognition; 2004 Oct; 93(3):B97-108. PubMed ID: 15178380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    Czypionka A; Kharaman M; Eulitz C
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1173352. PubMed ID: 37663335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. How the speed of working memory updating influences the on-line thematic processing of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese.
    Li XQ; Zheng YY; Zhao HY; Xia JY
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2014 Dec; 8(6):447-64. PubMed ID: 26396645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Syntactic flexibility and lexical encoding in aging sentence production: an eye tracking study.
    Weirick JD; Lee J
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1304517. PubMed ID: 39253036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.