These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29327248)

  • 1. Introducing new technology safely into urological practice.
    Van Bruwaene S; Namdarian B; Challacombe B; Eddy B; Billiet I
    World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 29327248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation.
    McCulloch P
    World J Urol; 2011 Jun; 29(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 21328089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovation in surgical technology and techniques: Challenges and ethical issues.
    Geiger JD; Hirschl RB
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2015 Jun; 24(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 25976146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.
    Donaldson NE; Rutledge DN; Ashley J
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1 Suppl 1():S41-51. PubMed ID: 17129334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting Clearer About Surgical Innovation: A New Definition and a New Tool to Support Responsible Practice.
    Hutchison K; Rogers W; Eyers A; Lotz M
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 25719812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing surgical innovation through a specialized medical school pathway of excellence in innovation and entrepreneurship: Lessons learned and opportunities for the future.
    Cohen MS
    Surgery; 2017 Nov; 162(5):989-993. PubMed ID: 28778581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical simulation: a urological perspective.
    Wignall GR; Denstedt JD; Preminger GM; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS; Sweet RM; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1690-9. PubMed ID: 18343441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the innovation-decision process teaching strategy to promote evidence-based practice.
    Schmidt NA; Brown JM
    J Prof Nurs; 2007; 23(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17540318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical innovation and quality assurance: Can we have both?
    Georgeson K
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2015 Jun; 24(3):112-4. PubMed ID: 25976145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical guide to the Idea, Development and Exploration stages of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations.
    Pennell CP; Hirst AD; Campbell WB; Sood A; Agha RA; Barkun JS; McCulloch P
    Br J Surg; 2016 Apr; 103(5):607-15. PubMed ID: 26865013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical advances in urological laparoscopic surgery.
    Hafron J; Kaouk JH
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Mar; 5(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 18331177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Innovating for quality and value: Utilizing national quality improvement programs to identify opportunities for responsible surgical innovation.
    Woo RK; Skarsgard ED
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2015 Jun; 24(3):138-40. PubMed ID: 25976151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons.
    Angelos P
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 24380544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.
    Zorn KC; Gautam G; Shalhav AL; Clayman RV; Ahlering TE; Albala DM; Lee DI; Sundaram CP; Matin SF; Castle EP; Winfield HN; Gettman MT; Lee BR; Thomas R; Patel VR; Leveillee RJ; Wong C; Badlani GH; Rha KH; Eggener SE; Wiklund P; Mottrie A; Atug F; Kural AR; Joseph JV;
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1126-32. PubMed ID: 19625032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood.
    Snow-Lisy DC; Yerkes EB; Cheng EY
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 25839383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.