These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29327661)
1. Evaluations of the tongue and hyoid bone positions and pharyngeal airway dimensions after maxillary protraction treatment. Hwang DM; Lee JY; Choi YJ; Hwang CJ Cranio; 2019 Jul; 37(4):214-222. PubMed ID: 29327661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Early treatment of Class III malocclusion by maxillary protraction facial mask: effects on craniofacial structures and upper airway dimensions]. Dakhlaoui H; Ben El Kahla R; Gmati H; Nasfi M; El Yemni Zinelabidine A Orthod Fr; 2020 Oct; 91(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 33146618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position after maxillary protraction with different alternate rapid maxillary expansion and construction protocols: A prospective clinical study. Celikoglu M; Buyukcavus MH Angle Orthod; 2017 Jul; 87(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 28139938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions. Lee JW; Park KH; Kim SH; Park YG; Kim SJ Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 21299388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships among tongue volume, hyoid position, airway volume and maxillofacial form in paediatric patients with Class-I, Class-II and Class-III malocclusions. Iwasaki T; Suga H; Yanagisawa-Minami A; Sato H; Sato-Hashiguchi M; Shirazawa Y; Tsujii T; Yamamoto Y; Kanomi R; Yamasaki Y Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Feb; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 30421852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions of protraction and rapid palatal expansion in Class III malocclusion subjects. Kilinç AS; Arslan SG; Kama JD; Ozer T; Dari O Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 17906307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper-airway dimension. Hiyama S; Suda N; Ishii-Suzuki M; Tsuiki S; Ogawa M; Suzuki S; Kuroda T Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 11843272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric study of the upper airway in surgically corrected class III skeletal deformity. Samman N; Tang SS; Xia J Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(3):180-90. PubMed ID: 12353936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sagittal airway dimensions following maxillary protraction: a pilot study. Sayinsu K; Isik F; Arun T Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 16464873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Mucedero M; Cozza P Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 19752018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects. Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Cozza P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19524838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper airway dimensions in skeletal Class III malocclusions]. Nie P; Zhu M; Lu XF Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Jun; 18(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 19649515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes of hyoid, tongue and pharyngeal airway after mandibular setback surgery by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Hwang S; Chung CJ; Choi YJ; Huh JK; Kim KH Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 19905855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of airway dimensions and changes in hyoid bone position following class II functional therapy with activator. Ulusoy C; Canigur Bavbek N; Tuncer BB; Tuncer C; Turkoz C; Gencturk Z Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):917-25. PubMed ID: 24909154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced increase in pharyngeal airway size in Japanese class II children following a 1-year treatment with an activator appliance. Horihata A; Ueda H; Koh M; Watanabe G; Tanne K Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 24640074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of maxillary protraction appliances on airway dimensions in growing class III maxillary retrognathic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ming Y; Hu Y; Li Y; Yu J; He H; Zheng L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():138-145. PubMed ID: 29447802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sagittal airway changes: rapid palatal expansion versus Le Fort I osteotomy during maxillary protraction. Cakirer B; Kucukkeles N; Nevzatoglu S; Koldas T Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 21464152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 2-year follow-up of changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism: 3-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume and hyoid bone position. Shin JH; Kim MA; Park IY; Park YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 73(2):340.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25579018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the short-term effects of different maxillary protraction methods on pharyngeal airway dimensions. Kale B; Buyukcavus MH Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Nov; 24(4):543-552. PubMed ID: 33506632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]