These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29328775)

  • 1. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.
    Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
    Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.
    Buchholz TA; Somerfield MR; Griggs JJ; El-Eid S; Hammond ME; Lyman GH; Mason G; Newman LA
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 May; 32(14):1502-6. PubMed ID: 24711553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Dong W; Smith BD; Moran MS; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Kuerer HM; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2965-2974. PubMed ID: 29987598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on Rates of Re-excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Havel L; Naik H; Ramirez L; Morrow M; Landercasper J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 30790112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
    Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines on reoperation rates following breast-conserving surgery.
    Monaghan A; Chapinal N; Hughes L; Baliski C
    Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):862-867. PubMed ID: 30739736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Margins: a status report from the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.
    Harness JK; Giuliano AE; Pockaj BA; Downs-Kelly E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3192-7. PubMed ID: 25081342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
    Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines on Re-excision Rate in Breast-conserving Surgery: A Single-center Experience.
    Urooj N; Abubakar M; Asghar K; Hassan M; Malik AA; Rehman B; Sajjad B; Farooqi N; Chaudhry Z; Parvaiz A; Khan A
    J Cancer Allied Spec; 2024; 10(1):559. PubMed ID: 38259677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Smith BD; Moran MS; Klimberg S; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3250-6. PubMed ID: 26202554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
    Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
    Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/college of American Pathologists guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: a College of American Pathologists survey of 757 laboratories.
    Nakhleh RE; Grimm EE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Fitzgibbons PL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 May; 134(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 20441503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
    Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines.
    Heelan Gladden AA; Sams S; Gleisner A; Finlayson C; Kounalakis N; Hosokawa P; Brown R; Chong T; Mathes D; Murphy C
    Am J Surg; 2017 Dec; 214(6):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 28974314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Reoperation After Publication of Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Marinovich ML; Noguchi N; Morrow M; Houssami N
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Oct; 155(10):e203025. PubMed ID: 32857107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the SSO/ASTRO Margin Reexcision Guidelines on Costs Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Baliski CR; Pataky RE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):632-637. PubMed ID: 27882469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting surgical margins for invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy - Evidence for adopting a 1 mm negative width.
    Rakha EA; Quinn C; Masannat YA; Lee AHS; Tan PH; Karakatsanis A; Matrai ZT; Al Shaibani SHM; Gehani SA; Shaaban A; Khout H; Chagla L; Cserni G; Varga Z; Yong WF; Meattini I; Kulka J; Yang W; Tse GM; Pinder SE; Fox S; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108573. PubMed ID: 39243583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.