These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29329331)

  • 1. Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search.
    Wahn B; Czeszumski A; König P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191179. PubMed ID: 29329331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dyadic and triadic search: Benefits, costs, and predictors of group performance.
    Wahn B; Czeszumski A; Labusch M; Kingstone A; König P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2415-2433. PubMed ID: 31989452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurophysiological correlates of collective perceptual decision-making.
    Baumgart KG; Byvshev P; Sliby AN; Strube A; König P; Wahn B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 51(7):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 31418946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social influence protects collective decision making from equality bias.
    Hertz U; Romand-Monnier M; Kyriakopoulou K; Bahrami B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 26436525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.
    Wahn B; Kingstone A; König P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():669. PubMed ID: 28515704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exchange and cohesion in dyads and triads: A test of Simmel's hypothesis.
    Yoon J; Thye SR; Lawler EJ
    Soc Sci Res; 2013 Nov; 42(6):1457-66. PubMed ID: 24090845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-making.
    Bahrami B; Olsen K; Bang D; Roepstorff A; Rees G; Frith C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 21988362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.
    Wahn B; Schwandt J; Krüger M; Crafa D; Nunnendorf V; König P
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):781-95. PubMed ID: 26587687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.
    Hamada D; Nakayama M; Saiki J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 33057843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does popularity determine who leads in a dyadic cooperative task? Subtle differences between children with and without developmental disabilities.
    Vink R; Cillessen AHN; Hasselman F; Wijnants ML; Bosman AMT
    Res Dev Disabil; 2019 Nov; 94():103455. PubMed ID: 31499379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The wisdom of crowds for visual search.
    Juni MZ; Eckstein MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(21):E4306-E4315. PubMed ID: 28490500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback.
    Voinov PV; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():116-130. PubMed ID: 30953823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group benefits in joint perceptual tasks-a review.
    Wahn B; Kingstone A; König P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29754443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who gains more: Experts or novices? The benefits of interaction under numerical uncertainty.
    Sella F; Blakey R; Bang D; Bahrami B; Cohen Kadosh R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 30047765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrinsic group behaviour II: On the dependence of triad spatial dynamics on social and personal features; and on the effect of social interaction on small group dynamics.
    Zanlungo F; Yücel Z; Kanda T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225704. PubMed ID: 31794558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution.
    Zafeiris A; Vicsek T
    Nat Commun; 2013; 4():2484. PubMed ID: 24048260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collective enumeration.
    Bahrami B; Didino D; Frith C; Butterworth B; Rees G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):338-47. PubMed ID: 22889187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamics of collective performance in collaboration networks.
    Amelkin V; Askarisichani O; Kim YJ; Malone TW; Singh AK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204547. PubMed ID: 30304044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher social cue utilisation improves communication, reduces perceived workload, and improves performance amongst ad hoc dyads in simulated rail control.
    Yee DJ; Wiggins MW; Searle BJ
    Ergonomics; 2020 Jan; 63(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 31663427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to make collective decisions: the impact of confidence escalation.
    Mahmoodi A; Bang D; Ahmadabadi MN; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81195. PubMed ID: 24324677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.