BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2933)

  • 1. The size pH, and redox potential of the cecum in mice associated with various microbial floras.
    Celesk RA; Asano T; Wagner M
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1976 Feb; 151(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 2933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of Clostridium difficile and Escherichia coli with microfloras in continuous-flow cultures and gnotobiotic mice.
    Wilson KH; Freter R
    Infect Immun; 1986 Nov; 54(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 3533778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oxidation-reduction potentials in the cecal contents of rats and mice.
    Koopman JP; Janssen FG; van Druten JA
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1975 Sep; 149(4):995-9. PubMed ID: 241085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of bacterial contamination on cecal size and cecal contents of gnotobiotic rodents.
    Loesche WJ
    J Bacteriol; 1969 Aug; 99(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 5808078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of volatile fatty acids in colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile in gnotobiotic mice.
    Su WJ; Waechter MJ; Bourlioux P; Dolegeal M; Fourniat J; Mahuzier G
    Infect Immun; 1987 Jul; 55(7):1686-91. PubMed ID: 3596806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intracolonic tensions of oxygen and carbon dioxide in germfree, conventional, and gnotobiotic rats.
    Bornside GH; Donovan WE; Myers MB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1976 Feb; 151(2):437-41. PubMed ID: 766018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of various bacterial suspensions derived from cecal floras of conventional chickens in reducing the population level of Salmonella typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice and chicken intestines.
    Hudault S; Bewa H; Bridonneau C; Raibaud P
    Can J Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 31(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 3910208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gnotobiotic models for study of the microbial ecology of Clostridium difficile and Escherichia coli.
    Wilson KH; Sheagren JN; Freter R; Weatherbee L; Lyerly D
    J Infect Dis; 1986 Mar; 153(3):547-51. PubMed ID: 3512730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oxidation-reduction potentials in cecal contents of germfree and conventional rats.
    Wostmann BS; Bruckner-Kardoss E
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1966 Apr; 121(4):1111-4. PubMed ID: 5937711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Clostridium difficile, Lactobacillus casei, Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus sp. on anomalous lower bowel function on germfree mice.
    Pesti L; Kokas E; Gordon HA
    Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 1981; 4(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 6793297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modification of cecal size in germfree rats by long-term feeding of anion exchange resin.
    Asano T
    Am J Physiol; 1969 Oct; 217(4):911-8. PubMed ID: 5824328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of toxins produced by various Clostridium difficile strains on cecum size reduction in gnotobiotic mice.
    Mahé S; Corthier G
    Can J Microbiol; 1988 Jul; 34(7):916-8. PubMed ID: 3143476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reduction in cecal size and E. coli and enterococcal populations of gnotobiotic mice by chloroform-resistant bacteria from the cecum of conventional mice].
    Morishita Y; Ozaki A; Yamamoto T; Mitsu-Oka T
    Nihon Saikingaku Zasshi; 1980 Mar; 35(2):431-2. PubMed ID: 7241812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MUCUS IN INTESTINAL CONTENTS OF GERMFREE RATS.
    LINDSTEDT G; LINDSTEDT S; GUSTAFSSON BE
    J Exp Med; 1965 Feb; 121(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 14264267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Transfer of the cecal flora of the hamster to the germfree C3H mouse: use of this model to study the flora of the anti-Clostridium difficile barrier].
    Su WJ; Bourlioux P; Bournaud M; Besnier MO; Fourniat J
    Can J Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 32(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 3516351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Redox potential of cecum content of growing pigs and its relation with pH and VFA concentration.
    Lizardo R; Tous N; Sampsonis C; D'Inca R; Calvo MA; Brufau J
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():409-11. PubMed ID: 23365395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical resistance and ATPase levels in the cecal wall of germ free and conventional rats.
    Simonetta M; Faelli A; Cremaschi D; Gordon HA
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1975 Nov; 150(2):541-5. PubMed ID: 128761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Normalization' of germfree mice with anaerobically cultured caecal flora of 'normal' mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM; Mullink JW; Prins RA; Stadhouders AM; De Boer H; Hectors MP
    Lab Anim; 1984 Apr; 18(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 6379286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amino acid composition of cecal contents and feces in germfree and conventional rabbits.
    Yoshida T; Pleasants JR; Reddy BS; Wostmann BS
    J Nutr; 1971 Oct; 101(10):1423-9. PubMed ID: 5107264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indigenous microorganisms prevent reduction in cecal size induced by Salmonella typhimurium in vaccinated gnotobiotic mice.
    Tannock GW; Savage DC
    Infect Immun; 1976 Jan; 13(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 765282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.