These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29330008)

  • 1. Electrophysiological brain indices of risk behavior modification induced by contingent feedback.
    Megías A; Torres MA; Catena A; Cándido A; Maldonado A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Feb; 124():43-53. PubMed ID: 29330008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.
    de Groot K; van Strien JW
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13390. PubMed ID: 31069812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different strategies underlying uncertain decision making: higher executive performance is associated with enhanced feedback-related negativity.
    Kóbor A; Takács Á; Janacsek K; Németh D; Honbolygó F; Csépe V
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Mar; 52(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 25224177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modifying Evaluations and Decisions in Risky Situations.
    Maldonado A; Serra S; Catena A; Cándido A; Megías A
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Sep; 19():E53. PubMed ID: 27647040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain and autonomic association accompanying stochastic decision-making.
    Ohira H; Ichikawa N; Nomura M; Isowa T; Kimura K; Kanayama N; Fukuyama S; Shinoda J; Yamada J
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):1024-37. PubMed ID: 19647796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in neural correlates of feedback processing after economic decisions under risk.
    Fernandes C; Pasion R; Gonçalves AR; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2018 May; 65():51-59. PubMed ID: 29407466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance and uncertainty jointly influence reward anticipation at the level of the SPN ERP component.
    Walentowska W; Paul K; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):287-297. PubMed ID: 29129655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder.
    Sehrig S; Weiss A; Miller GA; Rockstroh B
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13450. PubMed ID: 31380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.
    Gomez-Andres A; Suades A; Cucurell D; de Miquel MA; Juncadella M; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Neuroimage Clin; 2019; 24():102075. PubMed ID: 31734528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-taking on the road and in the mind: behavioural and neural patterns of decision making between risky and safe drivers.
    Ba Y; Zhang W; Peng Q; Salvendy G; Crundall D
    Ergonomics; 2016; 59(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 26230746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-reported strategies in decisions under risk: role of feedback, reasoning abilities, executive functions, short-term-memory, and working memory.
    Schiebener J; Brand M
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 26289475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blunted feedback processing during risky decision making in adolescents with a parental history of substance use disorders.
    Euser AS; Greaves-Lord K; Crowley MJ; Evans BE; Huizink AC; Franken IH
    Dev Psychopathol; 2013 Nov; 25(4 Pt 1):1119-36. PubMed ID: 24229553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain correlates of risky decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Sartori G; Rumiati R; Vidotto G; Daum I
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1886-94. PubMed ID: 19761850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State- and trait-greed, its impact on risky decision-making and underlying neural mechanisms.
    Mussel P; Reiter AM; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    Soc Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 10(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 25300601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paying out one versus paying out all trials and the decrease in behavioral and brain activity in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.
    Xu S; Wang H; Wang C
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13510. PubMed ID: 31793670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-dependent characteristics of feedback evaluation related to monetary gains and losses.
    Kardos Z; Tóth B; Boha R; File B; Molnár M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Dec; 122():42-49. PubMed ID: 27235583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-preceding negativity is modulated by action-outcome contingency.
    Masaki H; Yamazaki K; Hackley SA
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20134356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome evaluations in group decision-making using authority rule: An electrophysiological study.
    Kimura K; Sawada H; Katayama J
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():271-279. PubMed ID: 30189183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.